On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Matthew Butch wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Christopher Nighswonger wrote:
>
> > As I see it, the advantage and rational for moving to GPLv3 are
> > primarily that GPLv3 is compatible with AGPLv3. This allows us to
> > accept work licensed under either o
On May 9, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Christopher Nighswonger wrote:
> As I see it, the advantage and rational for moving to GPLv3 are
> primarily that GPLv3 is compatible with AGPLv3. This allows us to
> accept work licensed under either of these two licenses.
I don't know if that is true. From what I u
Greetings all,
Some time ago the topic of changing the version/flavor of GPL license
Koha is released under was discussed.
In light of the momentum the community has built up in the area of
change in recent months, now would be a good time to resume licensing
discussions and bring them to a final
