Le 07/05/2010 05:38, Brendan Gallagher a écrit :
> Ok my interested is peaked.
>
> Any body want to propose times dates methods? I think a discussion in IRC
> would be the best.
>
> So, I think the ball is in your court Chris. I'd say pick a time that is
> good for you and if anyone misses th
Ok my interested is peaked.
Any body want to propose times dates methods? I think a discussion in IRC
would be the best.
So, I think the ball is in your court Chris. I'd say pick a time that is good
for you and if anyone misses then they can read about it in the logs and follow
up on the lis
On 4 May 2010 19:58, Chris Cormack wrote:
> On 4 May 2010 19:47, Colin Campbell wrote:
>> I heard that PSGI on nginx is very fast. I was impressed by a
>> presentation on PSGI/Plack by its author, but haven't really played with
>> it since. Has anyone any experience of it?
>> Colin
>>
Really unsc
On 4 May 2010 19:47, Colin Campbell wrote:
> I heard that PSGI on nginx is very fast. I was impressed by a
> presentation on PSGI/Plack by its author, but haven't really played with
> it since. Has anyone any experience of it?
> Colin
>
Hi Colin
Not in any production environment I haven't. But I
I heard that PSGI on nginx is very fast. I was impressed by a
presentation on PSGI/Plack by its author, but haven't really played with
it since. Has anyone any experience of it?
Colin
--
Colin Campbell
Chief Software Engineer,
PTFS Europe Limited
Content Management and Library Solutions
+44 (0)
On 4 May 2010 09:30, Fouts, Clay wrote:
> Thanks for the further info. Sorry for the imprecision, but here I meant
> "scale" in the sense of individual Koha installations per web server rather
> than hits per installation. My concern is the feasibility of implementing a
> scheme like this on a web
Thanks for the further info. Sorry for the imprecision, but here I meant
"scale" in the sense of individual Koha installations per web server rather
than hits per installation. My concern is the feasibility of implementing a
scheme like this on a web server which is configured to service requests f
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Thomas Krichel wrote:
> Does the speed increase come more from FastCGI or more from
> using nginx instead of Apache? I generally don't like Apache,
> but using a different web server means finding a box where you
> run just that server or convert all servers t
Hi all
Quick reply as im on the bus.
Clay i stress tested with 100 concurrent requests, stepping up in 10s
after, apache2 + cgi started swapping hard load got up to 124 before i
killed the test. in 252 seconds got 11 200 responses.
with nginx which has virtually zero memory footprint + the FCGI::As
I'm very interested interested in learning more about this, also. How well
does it scale? My experience with FastCGI is that it can lend performance
improvements, but it's often at considerable cost in terms of memory. Does
the FCGI handle all the scripts or only key performance-sensitive ones, lik
Brendan Gallagher writes
> Friday evening here (west coast USA), Saturday evening in New
> Zealand. Chris Cormack was showing quite a few of the developers
> that hang out in the IRC #koha channel - his testing database of
> koha - fed through nginx and FastCGI.
I could not get it to run wi
Hi All -
Friday evening here (west coast USA), Saturday evening in New Zealand. Chris
Cormack was showing quite a few of the developers that hang out in the IRC
#koha channel - his testing database of koha - fed through nginx and FastCGI.
I was absolutely amazed at the speed that pages from t
12 matches
Mail list logo
