> Silly question: would it be OK if the code were not displayed on the
> patron detail page, just the description?
The trouble with that, from my point of view, is that "description"
sounds like it should be explanatory rather than a short label. I'd
prefer leaving things as they are (with non-edi
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Owen Leonard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation Galen. I wish the code could be edited,
> because it's acting as a label for data output on the patron detail
> page. It'd be nice to be able to change that label if the definition
> needed to
> I believe the user interface currently prevents one from
> changing the code, but I did that mostly to avoid having to handle
> several error reporting scenarios.
Thanks for the explanation Galen. I wish the code could be edited,
because it's acting as a label for data output on the patron detai
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Owen Leonard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would think there should be an auto-incrementing numeric id in the
> borrower_attribute_types table for each code which would get entered
> into the borrower_attributes table. Then you could freely edit
> "code"'s val
I was looking at the new "Additional attributes and identifiers"
feature and have some questions about the table structure. I was
curious why "Patron attribute type code" is not editable. I see that
in the borrower_attribute_types table there is no unique numeric id,
just the "code":
borrower_attr
