Yes, I like this idea. I think we will start work on MarcXML and XSLT. The
customer may not want to wait so we will give them something simpler for
now.
Thanks everybody for your input!
Savitra Sirohi
MD, Nucsoft OSS Labs
http://www.osslabs.biz
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Ryan Higgins wrot
I also am against the idea of overloading the frameworks
mechanism for record import. IMO the frameworks already
try to do too much.
My preferred solution would be to alter the import code so that
it can accept MARCXML records. An XSLT stylesheet can then
be specified either in the staging tool
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> One of our customers wants the ability to import Follett marc records
>> without having to use Marc Edit (to change fields 852 to 952).
>>
>> We want to make this change generic such that it will work for any
>> import file that has holdings in fields other than 952.
>>
>> This i
OK sorry bout that... I'm using MarcEdit to verify the vendor information
they sent so good luck in making the changes.
they could use MARCEDIT utility to Join records into one file and do the F11
renaming tags and subfields.
Sorry.
David Schuster
savitra wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> One of our c
>
>> 2. Accept framework code as user input from stage-marc-import.pl. User
>> could choose nothing which means input file already has holdings in
>> 952. Or could choose Follett or some other vendor.
>>
There are utilities in Kyle Hall's koha-tools collection that pretty
much do this--th
Hi to all,
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:36:27 +0530, savitra sirohi
> One of our customers wants the ability to import Follett marc records
> without having to use Marc Edit (to change fields 852 to 952).
> We want to make this change generic such that it will work for any
> import file that has holding
Folks,
One of our customers wants the ability to import Follett marc records
without having to use Marc Edit (to change fields 852 to 952).
We want to make this change generic such that it will work for any
import file that has holdings in fields other than 952.
This is what we were thinking, wi
