Patch submitted
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Galen Charlton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Nicole Engard wrote:
>> That brings us to our question - should we move this link on the Admin
>> page? And should we alter the description at the top of the page to
>> make it clear
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Nicole Engard wrote:
> That brings us to our question - should we move this link on the Admin
> page? And should we alter the description at the top of the page to
> make it clear that Authorized Values are actually system wide? And if
> so I don't mind repor
Paul - I updated the online help before the release of 3.0 - so it is
up to date for 3.0 :) and I sent some patches in to 3.2 with more
updates, but I can update it for Authorized Values for sure ;)
Nicole
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:41 AM, paul POULAIN wrote:
> Nicole Engard a écrit :
>> Hi all,
Nicole Engard a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
Hi Nicole,
> Colin and I were having an off list email back and forth with
> questions that hopefully you all can help us with. I asked him why
> some of his new patches didn't add new defaults to the Authorized
> Values list and he was concerned that the Aut
Hi all,
Colin and I were having an off list email back and forth with
questions that hopefully you all can help us with. I asked him why
some of his new patches didn't add new defaults to the Authorized
Values list and he was concerned that the Authorized Values were only
for Cataloging because t
