All good thoughts, in particular the design approach in #3 to maintain
freshness is a great new idea.
--joe
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Owen Leonard wrote:
> Now that we're up and running on 3.0, we're discovering some aspects
> of the Holds Queue report that are not working for us:
>
> 1
Now that we're up and running on 3.0, we're discovering some aspects
of the Holds Queue report that are not working for us:
1. Title. The list displays the title (245a) and only the title. No
subtitle, no name of part/section of a work (245p), no number of
part/section of a work (245n). This mak
