Re: [Koha-devel] Availability in Koha Was: Re: [Koha-patches] [PATCH 2/2] Fixes bug 4481: Limit to Available filters out many available items.

2010-05-19 Thread Ian Walls
Liz, I've been thinking about that for a while now. I'd like to see a partially user-configurable "status" setting, that includes some core status (checked out, in transit, on order, etc.), as well as the ability to define new ones. Status would be a code, a staff client name, an OPAC name, and

Re: [Koha-devel] [Koha] Proposal To Switch Koha's License to GPLv3 and AGPLv3 or AGPLv3

2010-05-19 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On ke, 2010-05-19 at 07:23 -0400, Chris Nighswonger wrote: > Given that this discussion has been somewhat carried on through the > wiki (http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/General_Meeting,_June_2_2010), > I thought it would be good to keep it on list as well. For what it's worth, I agree: it's be

[Koha-devel] Availability in Koha Was: Re: [Koha-patches] [PATCH 2/2] Fixes bug 4481: Limit to Available filters out many available items.

2010-05-19 Thread Liz Rea
While we're talking about availability, thought I'd put this out there. Our statewide ILL system would really appreciate a single field for availability on items: a "yes, you can have that for ILL" or "No, I'm sorry, that item is lost, checked out, out for repair, local use only, In transit, or

[Koha-devel] Patrons with no Checkouts report

2010-05-19 Thread Toni
Hello, After looking into the code of the predefined report "Patrons with No Checkouts" (borrowers_out.pl), I wonder whether the way it is generated (at least in Koha version 3.0.5) is a Bug: It only takes into consideration "old_issues" table, which means that Patrons having items for the first t

Re: [Koha-devel] patches for 3.0.x

2010-05-19 Thread Chris Nighswonger
2010/5/19 Marcel de Rooy : > Hi all, > What is the procedure for a patch to reach 3.0.x too (in general; this patch > is not that relevant) ? Just put a [3.0.x] in the subject line of your patch if it is 3.0.x specific. Otherwise, make a note what all it applies to in the commit message. Kind Reg

[Koha-devel] patches for 3.0.x

2010-05-19 Thread Marcel de Rooy
Hi all, Just a ´dumb´question from someone who just started submitting a few minor patches: Galen wrote: This patch is similar to commit 731b82f7641565c, which is present in HEAD and, if this is a significant enough issue in 3.0.x, should be cherry-picked to that branch. I've marked bug 4159

Re: [Koha-devel] [Koha] Proposal To Switch Koha's License to GPLv3 and AGPLv3 or AGPLv3

2010-05-19 Thread Chris Nighswonger
Given that this discussion has been somewhat carried on through the wiki (http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/General_Meeting,_June_2_2010), I thought it would be good to keep it on list as well. MJ posts the following argument to the above referenced agenda: > * AGPL does not prevent unfriendly

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha-3.0.6 Stable release

2010-05-19 Thread Chris Cormack
2010/5/19 Evelio Martínez : > > > Hello! > > Yesterday afternoon I download the 3.0.5 version and after 1 hour I see the > 3.0.6 version ready to download. > > Does anyone know why this big differences on tar size? > koha-3.00.05.tar.gz  94 Mb > koha-3.00.06.tar.gz  20 Mb > harley.tar.gz      21 Mb

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha-3.0.6 Stable release

2010-05-19 Thread Evelio Martínez
Hello! Yesterday afternoon I download the 3.0.5 version and after 1 hour I see the 3.0.6 version ready to download. Does anyone know why this big differences on tar size? koha-3.00.05.tar.gz 94 Mb koha-3.00.06.tar.gz 20 Mb harley.tar.gz 21 Mb Thanks in advance Evelio Mart