Thanks a lot to PTFS for contributing back to Koha its customer's code.
> I'm hoping that PTFS can help creating these branches, but anyone can
> do so at let me know where to pull from. They need to have the changes
> isolated if possible and be based on new_features. (Which at the
> moment tr
Fines/Fees +1
Accounts would cause us to need to do some retraining, but I think we could
live with it.
Liz Rea
NEKLS
On May 11, 2010, at 3:01 PM, Ian Walls wrote:
> Fines/Fees + 1
>
> I'm also alright with Accounts.
>
>
> -Ian
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Michael Hafen
> wrote:
Fines/Fees + 1
I'm also alright with Accounts.
-Ian
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Michael Hafen wrote:
> Fines / Fees +
>
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 09:59 +1200, Chris Cormack wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > So just a quick show of hands would be great
> >
> > The options are
> >
> > Leave it how i
Hi All
I'm sure most of you are aware that on May 10 (us time), PTFS made a
whole pile of their hitherto private changes public in the form of a
public git repo.
Galen (as Release Manager for 3.2) has gone through them and marked
the ones that are able to be included in 3.2 and in fact in the las
Hi,
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Michael Hafen
wrote:
> This would be true if time were not a finite resource. Unfortunately it
> is. As much as we would like to have more time in a day it is simply
> not possible. I agree with Galen; this is an unusually busy time for
> Koha developers b
Fines / Fees +
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 09:59 +1200, Chris Cormack wrote:
> Hi All
>
> So just a quick show of hands would be great
>
> The options are
>
> Leave it how it is (Fines)
> Fines/Fees
> Fees
> Charges
> Accounts
>
> My vote is for
> Accounts
>
> But i'd be happy with anything except
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 23:14 -0400, Chris Nighswonger wrote:
> > > > So may we postpone the rest of this discussion to post-3.2.0?
> > >
> > > As I stated in my original proposal: We are already very active atm, and
> > > now is
> > > the time to at least begin discussing this change.
> >
> > I am
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Matthew Butch wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Christopher Nighswonger wrote:
>
> > As I see it, the advantage and rational for moving to GPLv3 are
> > primarily that GPLv3 is compatible with AGPLv3. This allows us to
> > accept work licensed under either o
> There is a system preference maxItemsinSearchResults, which is only
> used in 2 places, both in C4::Search.
> It's not referenced anywhere else and hence is not set.
>
> But by not setting it, it means that in the staff client the counts of
> items available at each branch behaves in an unexpecte
On May 9, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Christopher Nighswonger wrote:
> As I see it, the advantage and rational for moving to GPLv3 are
> primarily that GPLv3 is compatible with AGPLv3. This allows us to
> accept work licensed under either of these two licenses.
I don't know if that is true. From what I u
Accounts +1
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha.org
[mailto:koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha.org] On
> Behalf Of Chris Cormack
> Sent: Monday, 10 May 2010 8:00 AM
> To: koha-devel
> Subject: [Koha-devel] Quick poll on Fines/Charges/Fees/Accounts
>
> Hi All
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Chris Cormack wrote:
> Hi All
>
> So just a quick show of hands would be great
>
> The options are
>
> Leave it how it is (Fines)
> Fines/Fees
> Fees
> Charges
> Accounts
>
> My vote is for
> Accounts
>
Accounts +1
___
Ko
Hi,
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Chris Cormack wrote:
> Fines/Fees
My preference.
> Accounts
I'm OK with this.
Regards,
Glaen
--
Galen Charlton
gmcha...@gmail.com
___
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha.org
http://lists.koha.org/mailm
Accounts+++
Fines/Fees+
Basically, I'll take either - but like Accounts better I think.
Nicole
2010/5/11 Rosalie Blake :
> Accounts +++
> Rosalie Blake
>
> 2010/5/11 Koustubha Kale
>>
>> Accounts ++
>>
>> Regards,
>> Koustubha Kale
>> Anant Corporation
>>
>> Contact Details :
>> Address : 103,
Accounts +++
Rosalie Blake
2010/5/11 Koustubha Kale
> Accounts ++
>
> Regards,
> Koustubha Kale
> Anant Corporation
>
> Contact Details :
> Address : 103, Armaan Residency, R. W Sawant Road, Nr. Golden Dyes Naka,
> Thane (w),
> Maharashtra, India, Pin : 400601.
> TeleFax : +91-22-21720
Accounts ++
Regards,
Koustubha Kale
Anant Corporation
Contact Details :
Address : 103, Armaan Residency, R. W Sawant Road, Nr. Golden Dyes Naka,
Thane (w),
Maharashtra, India, Pin : 400601.
TeleFax : +91-22-21720108, +91-22-21720109
Mobile : +919820715876
Website : http://www.anant
Hi,
I want to install perl module DBD::mysql on the Ubuntu v9.04(Server
Edition) but I face the following problem below,
cpan>force install DBD::mysql
CPAN: Storable loaded ok (v2.18)
Going to read /home/kohaadmin/.cpan/Metadata
Database was generated on Wed, 05 May 2010 14:28:31 GMT
CPAN: YAML
Hi Chris,
Am trying to Test my SAX Parser, and the following below is what I get;
Koha wants something like:
XML::LibXML::SAX::Parser=HASH(0x81fe220)
You have:
XML::LibXML::SAX=HASH(0x741678)
Looks bad, check INSTALL.* documentation.
And when I try to vi ParserDetails.ini file, I found
Hi all,
I would like to install Koha System on the said subject above. Can any one
help on where to get installation manual for this version of Ubuntu.
Thank u.
Bariki G. Kamara
Computer Programmer
Institute of Educational Technology(IET)
Open University of Tanzania(OUT)
--
[Moving to the more topical koha-devel]
For a bit of anecdotal evidence, we've been testing with the non-Parser
version for over six months with no ill effects. However, I definitely
encourage further, more rigorous compatibility tests before making a
recommendation. How do we go about testing tha
Dear Colleagues and thanks for the great work,
Below is content of a mail I posted to the koha list (
k...@lists.katipo.co.nz) but I have not been advised about the right and
best way to go about this. I am sorry for posting this to this forum. Could
someone kindly advise me on this. I need this a
On 11 May 2010 13:05, Galen Charlton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've started a wiki page to track the integration of 'Harley' into 3.2 and
> 3.4:
>
> http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/PTFSHarleyIntegration
>
> I created this page as an adjunct to the bugs database, which should
> be considered authoritat
Greetings all,
Some time ago the topic of changing the version/flavor of GPL license
Koha is released under was discussed.
In light of the momentum the community has built up in the area of
change in recent months, now would be a good time to resume licensing
discussions and bring them to a final
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:54 PM, MJ Ray wrote:
>
> Christopher Nighswonger wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:47 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > [...] It might mean that everyone who sees a page is entitled to
> > > the 227Mb source tarball. Who wants to pay for those downloads?
> >
> > Github and the
Christopher Nighswonger wrote:
> In light of the momentum the community has built up in the area of
> change in recent months, now would be a good time to resume licensing
> discussions and bring them to a final resolve.
I cannot contribute fully to this discussion at this time. Please can
we try
Hi,
I've started a wiki page to track the integration of 'Harley' into 3.2 and 3.4:
http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/PTFSHarleyIntegration
I created this page as an adjunct to the bugs database, which should
be considered authoritative concerning the status of any particular
issue or enhancem
Hello all,
Hope this is the right mailing list for this question. I'm busy trying to
migrate a Koha installation from one machine to another (and in the process
update to a new version of Koha!). Everything seems to be working, except
for the zebra functionality.
When I try to run rebuild_zebra.p
Hi,
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:47 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
> Christopher Nighswonger wrote:
>> In light of the momentum the community has built up in the area of
>> change in recent months, now would be a good time to resume licensing
>> discussions and bring them to a final resolve.
>
> I cannot contrib
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Galen Charlton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:47 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Christopher Nighswonger wrote:
> >> In light of the momentum the community has built up in the area of
> >> change in recent months, now would be a good time to resume licensing
>
Hi All
There is a system preference maxItemsinSearchResults, which is only
used in 2 places, both in C4::Search.
It's not referenced anywhere else and hence is not set.
But by not setting it, it means that in the staff client the counts of
items available at each branch behaves in an unexpected w
Hi All
So just a quick show of hands would be great
The options are
Leave it how it is (Fines)
Fines/Fees
Fees
Charges
Accounts
My vote is for
Accounts
But i'd be happy with anything except Fines
Chris
___
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.ko
We briefly talked about this at NEKLS: we agree with Galen that Charges defines
something else (at least in US libraryland), and that "fines and fees" would be
clearer for our libraries.
But, we can always just change it with jquery if we don't like what you do. ;)
Liz Rea
NEKLS
On May 7, 2
Christopher Nighswonger wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:47 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
> > [...] It might mean that everyone who sees a page is entitled to
> > the 227Mb source tarball. Who wants to pay for those downloads?
>
> Github and the like provide very simple solutions to this problem both with
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:47 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
> No, that additional requirement is one of the disadvantages. AGPLv3
> is still a fairly new licence and as far as I know, it's not yet
> entirely clear what is meant by "access", particularly for a modular
> system like Koha. It might mean that ev
34 matches
Mail list logo
