On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Owen Leonard wrote:
> Jane, I hope you don't mind I'm CC'ing the devel list since you
> replied only to me and I'm not an expert on this:
>
>> So the framework is only used in staff mode
>> for creating/editing bibs? What about the connection (if any) to the
>> act
I'm curious about the divergence of the SIP code between the Koha and
OpenNCIP code bases. For example, in
http://openncip.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openncip/src/SIPServer.pm?view=log
one can see that a bug fix was applied 2008-03-11 to the OpenNCIP code
that doesn't appear in the latest Koha vers
Jane, I hope you don't mind I'm CC'ing the devel list since you
replied only to me and I'm not an expert on this:
> So the framework is only used in staff mode
> for creating/editing bibs? What about the connection (if any) to the
> actual MARC standard? They keep making changes to that -- I jus
> * Along with an accompanying policy it defines what fields/subfields
> display in the OPAC and how they're labeled. Staff can always see all
> MARC fields in edit mode, but display depends on the policies. Does the
> framework control OPAC display in Koha?
Frameworks don't affect how data is d
Dear Jane,
same answer to your question:
>* It defines the MARC format, and must be updated when the MARC standard
>changes (new fields defined, new subfields defined, fields
>repeatable/not repeatable, etc.). Does the Koha framework set the MARC
>standard for the system?
No, the decision of MA
Thanks, Chris. I thought from the documentation that the framework
served the data entry template function, but I'm still not clear on a
few points. In the Sirsi-verse, the format policy serves three
purposes.
* It defines the MARC format, and must be updated when the MARC standard
changes (new
