Hi,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Paul POULAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - What about having an IRC meeting to nominate officially all Koha
> positions ? and announce them everywhere.
Good idea. I suggest Thursday, 11 September or Friday, 12 September
at 19:00 UTC to give us a fighting chan
Hi,
Back from my august vacation, it seems that we have reach the 3.0
official release, and that's good to see.
IMO, the next step is to organize the next months team
we need a 3.2 Release Manager, and we have one candidate (galen, LibLime).
we need a Release Maintainer, and we have 2 candidate
Zeno Tajoli a écrit :
> in fact I have done an error on cut & paste.
in fact you did 3 ;-) :
> get checkout kohaclone
> get pull
won't give you anything interesting.
git checkout kohaclone
git pull
will be much more usefull :D
--
Paul POULAIN
http://www.biblibre.com
Expert en Logiciels Libres
Hi,
At 14.54 03/09/2008, Galen Charlton wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Zeno Tajoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > get checkout my3.0.x
>
>You may want to do
>
>git checkout -b my3.0.x
>
>in order to create a new 3.0 working branch, unless my3.0.x exists already.
in fact I have done an er
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Zeno Tajoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> get checkout my3.0.x
You may want to do
git checkout -b my3.0.x
in order to create a new 3.0 working branch, unless my3.0.x exists already.
Regards,
Galen
--
Galen Charlton
VP, Research & Development, LibLime
[EMAIL
Hi to all,
>On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:24:28AM +0200, Zeno Tajoli wrote:
> > Starting from perl scripts avaible from internet we want to develop a
> > script that read Koha API (C4 dir) and write a .xmi file
> > with an UML rappresentation of classes, methods and usage of methods.
>
>Just some tho
Hi to all,
I have little experience with git so I ask you a confirm of my thoughts.
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:05:53 -0500
From: "Galen Charlton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Koha] Koha 3.0.x Git branch created
>If you are running a dev-mode installation of Koha 3.0 and you *don't*
>want your ins
