Re: [Koha-devel] Can we do away with items.onloan?

2018-05-19 Thread Manos PETRIDIS
Surely, an item's checkout date and/or date due do not belong to the bibliographic marcxml field. What if we have more than one copies of a certain book for example? MP Στις Παρ, 18 Μαΐ 2018 στις 9:26 μμ ο χρήστης Barton Chittenden < bar...@bywatersolutions.com> έγραψε: > One of my first trouble

Re: [Koha-devel] Can we do away with items.onloan?

2018-05-19 Thread Katrin Fischer
Hi Manos, it's an item field, so it's added for every item in 952/955. As the complete items information is added on time of indexing, I think what Barton suggests is already the case? Katrin On 20.05.2018 00:06, Manos PETRIDIS wrote: Surely, an item's checkout date and/or date due do not b

Re: [Koha-devel] Can we do away with items.onloan?

2018-05-19 Thread Barton Chittenden
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Katrin Fischer wrote: > Hi Manos, > > it's an item field, so it's added for every item in 952/955. > > As the complete items information is added on time of indexing, I think > what Barton suggests is already the case? > That's my understanding. For background: