> ./opac/unapi
I can't comment on the rest, but I know that changing this
publicly-accessible path would break any current usage that relies on
it. I have non-Koha scripts that use unapi to pull data from Koha. If
you change the path my scripts will break.
-- Owen
--
Web Developer
Athens Coun
On 30/07/11 20:51, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> Some of Koha's Perl scripts have filenames not ending in .pl.
> This just hit me badly because those are not handled by fix-perl-path.PL.
There's no reason for a perl program to end in .pl beyond convention
(and a discredited convention in some circles) I thin
> There's no reason for a perl program to end in .pl beyond convention
Yes, of course.
But if you have nearly all of the scripts ending in .pl and a fix-perl-path.PL
that seems to suggest all the scripts do end in .pl, that's confusing.
Let me elaborate on how this hit me:
I was working for a fix
Hi all
It's nearly that time again, for our monthly IRC meeting.
The agenda is here
http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/General_IRC_Meeting,_2_August_2011
The meeting is open to all with an interest in Koha.
http://koha-community.org/get-involved/irc/
Please come along, Koha is what we make it
> Also, it's best sending patches using the git tools.
I tried to understand the problem, but I didn't. I asked a GIT aware colleague
to understand the problem, but he didn't either. I asked here to convert what I
sent into what I should have sent (so I could understand the difference), but
to n
> ./svc/bib_profile
> ./svc/bib
I can't find any references to these. Is this dead code?
___
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-communit
On 1 August 2011 09:40, Edgar Fuß wrote:
>> Also, it's best sending patches using the git tools.
> I tried to understand the problem, but I didn't. I asked a GIT aware
> colleague to understand the problem, but he didn't either. I asked here to
> convert what I sent into what I should have sent
On 1 August 2011 10:17, Edgar Fuß wrote:
>> If you use git format-patch and then git send-email to send it to the
>> koha-patches mailing list.
> Oh well, I'll try this tomorrow. It's past midnight in my timezone now.
>
>> that's not as nessecary the mailing list is the main place
> Is that inform
There are reasons that these scripts lack that extension. koha-preferences
doesn't have the extension since it's a utility intended to be run from the
command line, as opposed to a cronjob or CGI script. Services just lack the
extension to distinguish them from user-facing CGI scripts. Besides, if
On 2011-08-1, at 10:19 AM, Chris Cormack wrote:
> On 1 August 2011 10:17, Edgar Fuß wrote:
>>> If you use git format-patch and then git send-email to send it to the
>>> koha-patches mailing list.
>> Oh well, I'll try this tomorrow. It's past midnight in my timezone now.
>>
>>> that's not as nes
+1 for removing redundancy ;)
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org
[mailto:koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org] Namens Mason James
Verzonden: maandag 1 augustus 2011 02:50
CC: koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Koha-devel] Patc
11 matches
Mail list logo
