Hi
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Jonathan Druart
wrote:
> 2013/12/19 Galen Charlton :
> I have already created an account for sandboxes' SO : sandbo...@biblibre.com.
> By signing off, the form asks for a name and an email address. These 2
> information are used to fill the Signed-off-by line i
2013/12/19 Galen Charlton :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Paul Poulain
> wrote:
>> Le 18/12/2013 23:31, Galen Charlton a écrit :
>>> Paul Poulain- 63
>> I don't endorse those 63: most of them (if not all) were in fact
>> sandboxes signoff, because I use my account to send signoff fro
Le 18/12/2013 23:36, Galen Charlton a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Paul Poulain
> wrote:
>> Le 10/12/2013 23:50, Brendan Gallagher a écrit :
>>> Finishing the Plackifying of the staff-side so that it could be
>>> stably used.
>> The SAN-OP is running Plack on staff since 3.1
Le 19/12/2013 18:22, Paul A a écrit :
> At 05:17 PM 12/19/2013 +0100, Paul Poulain wrote:
> [snip]
>> And if I were playful[*], I would bounce[*] on the fact that you highly
>> value the work we're doing: [snip]
>>
>> [*] strictly no negative meaning here, I hope google translate didn't
>> lied to
At 05:17 PM 12/19/2013 +0100, Paul Poulain wrote:
[snip]
And if I were playful[*], I would bounce[*] on the fact that you highly
value the work we're doing: [snip]
[*] strictly no negative meaning here, I hope google translate didn't
lied to me with these words...
Ça aide d'être multilingue --
Le 18/12/2013 23:31, Galen Charlton a écrit :
> Hi,
> Paul Poulain- 63
I don't endorse those 63: most of them (if not all) were in fact
sandboxes signoff, because I use my account to send signoff from the
sandboxes. Maybe we should/could create a generic "sandbox signoff"
account ?
> That last sen
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Paul Poulain wrote:
> Le 18/12/2013 23:31, Galen Charlton a écrit :
>> Paul Poulain- 63
> I don't endorse those 63: most of them (if not all) were in fact
> sandboxes signoff, because I use my account to send signoff from the
> sandboxes. Maybe we should/could
On 19 December 2013 11:36, Galen Charlton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Paul Poulain
> wrote:
>> Le 10/12/2013 23:50, Brendan Gallagher a écrit :
>>> Finishing the Plackifying of the staff-side so that it could be stably
>>> used.
>> The SAN-OP is running Plack on staff since
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Paul Poulain wrote:
> Le 10/12/2013 23:50, Brendan Gallagher a écrit :
>> Finishing the Plackifying of the staff-side so that it could be stably
>> used.
> The SAN-OP is running Plack on staff since 3.10, it runs fine, except
> for C4/BackgroundJobs, and we co
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Paul Poulain wrote:
> Le 10/12/2013 01:59, Galen Charlton a écrit :
> I'd like to see as many of the 70 improvements or new features already
> submitted by BibLibre (plus more coming) being signed-off, QAed and
> pushed (Sorry if I appear a little bit rude)
>
Le 10/12/2013 01:59, Galen Charlton a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> For discussion, here is a list of some of some things I would like to
> see in 3.16. This is not meant to be complete; please feel free to use
> this thread both to comment on my goals and to suggest goals that you're
> personally willing to
Le 10/12/2013 22:11, Chris Cormack a écrit :
> Hi All
Hi Chris,
> In addition to the goals Galen has mentioned.
>
> Catalyst and Bywater are working on adding ElasticSearch as an option
> for searching in Koha.
> It will of course not remove Zebra, but will provide the option of
> using it as a s
Le 10/12/2013 23:50, Brendan Gallagher a écrit :
> New catalogers interface - which Jesse Weaver has been working on and
> we're getting closer and closer to having that ready to submit. (Jesse
> did a quick demo at KohaCon in Reno). I bug pianohacker daily on when
> that's going to be submitted
Dear Community!
My devious little plan for 3.16 is to start getting some RDF/Linked
Data/Semantic Web stuff into Koha.
There are two sides to this, both of which should of course be
completely opt-in and without side-effects for the MARC-based
functionality in Koha:
* MARC2RDF conversion
MARC r
Paul A schreef op wo 11-12-2013 om 13:25 [-0500]:
> The other (in my mind anyway) point that I fear we are overlooking, is
> that
> this "browser" discussion started with Bootstrap v3 -- and all of this
> is
> just an expanded CSS usage for cosmetic purposes - rounded corners on
> boxes, etc, -
At 11:33 PM 12/11/2013 +1300, Chris Cormack wrote:
* Mathieu Saby (mathieu.s...@univ-rennes2.fr) wrote:
> Hi
> Do you know what is the share of FF 3.6 and IE 7 in Nigeria,
> Philippines, Pakistan or Turkey?
> I suppose that people in those countries probably can't afford to
> change computers as
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Owen Leonard wrote:
> Let's let the real statistics tell the story. As far as my library
> goes, IE 7 traffic over the last year was .7% of all visits. FF 3.x
> traffic during the same period was .8%.
Here are some more numbers I've gotten for IE7 usage fr
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Liz Rea wrote:
> IE 7 is only available in Windows XP, which is due to be end of life in
> April 2014.
Something I think also gets lost in the discussion: Just because
someone is still running Windows XP doesn't mean they're using IE 7.
The latest versions of Fir
On the ElasticSearch front, is there an RFC somewhere with some really
clear technical goals for the development stating what problems it hopes to
solve and how..? I'de like to see these so the project gets as much
support as possible as I'de love to see it flourish to completion. I'm
wondering i
I was just asking questions...
Some answers are here
http://gs.statcounter.com/
France:
Firefox 2.00.02
Firefox 3.00.06
Firefox 3.50.05
Firefox 3.60.28
IE 6.00.13
IE 7.00.94
=> total = 1.48% last month
Philippines:
Firefox 2.00.01
Firefox 3.00.05
Firefox 3.50.
* Mathieu Saby (mathieu.s...@univ-rennes2.fr) wrote:
> Hi
> Do you know what is the share of FF 3.6 and IE 7 in Nigeria,
> Philippines, Pakistan or Turkey?
> I suppose that people in those countries probably can't afford to
> change computers as soon as here...
>
> By the way, my university is sti
Hi
Do you know what is the share of FF 3.6 and IE 7 in Nigeria,
Philippines, Pakistan or Turkey?
I suppose that people in those countries probably can't afford to change
computers as soon as here...
By the way, my university is still using Windows XP, so it is not
"dangerous" (but of course w
At 09:59 AM 12/11/2013 +1300, Liz Rea wrote:
On 11/12/13 05:40, Owen Leonard wrote:
>> [4] Upgrade the version of Bootstrap we use to 3.x.
> As I mentioned in IRC today the primary caveat for this goal is that
> Bootstrap 3 says it "drops support for Internet Explorer 7 and Firefox
> 3.6." Howev
Some plans that ByWater (Kyle, Jesse, etc.) has for 3.16 (or at least make
sure our patches are out there).
Elastic Search - which Chris talked about.
New catalogers interface - which Jesse Weaver has been working on and we're
getting closer and closer to having that ready to submit. (Jesse did
Greetings,
If it means broken functionality, that is a problem for us.
If it means graceful degradation, that's more acceptable.
Yes and yes.
I'll be doing some investigation, but I think we need some opinions
from others about what level of support we need to offer for IE7
and FF 3.6.
IE
Hi All
In addition to the goals Galen has mentioned.
Catalyst and Bywater are working on adding ElasticSearch as an option
for searching in Koha.
It will of course not remove Zebra, but will provide the option of
using it as a search tool instead.
The brief plan is
Write code, so that if Elasti
On 11/12/13 05:40, Owen Leonard wrote:
>> [4] Upgrade the version of Bootstrap we use to 3.x.
> As I mentioned in IRC today the primary caveat for this goal is that
> Bootstrap 3 says it "drops support for Internet Explorer 7 and Firefox
> 3.6." However, it doesn't explicitly say what "dropping su
> [4] Upgrade the version of Bootstrap we use to 3.x.
As I mentioned in IRC today the primary caveat for this goal is that
Bootstrap 3 says it "drops support for Internet Explorer 7 and Firefox
3.6." However, it doesn't explicitly say what "dropping support"
means. If it means broken functionality
28 matches
Mail list logo
