This problem is about to be solved, it seems:
https://code.facebook.com/posts/300798627056246/relicensing-react-jest-flow-and-immutable-js/
Regards
El mar., 25 jul. 2017 a las 9:16, Thomas Dukleth ()
escribió:
> [Reply inline.]
>
> On Tue, July 25, 2017 06:42, Jesse wrote:
> > While I personall
[Reply inline.]
On Tue, July 25, 2017 06:42, Jesse wrote:
> While I personally believe that patent aggression from Facebook would be
> suicidal for their open-source presence and gain them little, there is
> enough of a possibility to raise some concern.
As I tried to emphasise previously, the pr
While I personally believe that patent aggression from Facebook would be
suicidal for their open-source presence and gain them little, there is
enough of a possibility to raise some concern. I keep my fingers crossed
that Facebook will do the same for React as RocksDB, and dual-license under
the AP
I take Kivilahti Olli-Antti's response as helpfully encouraging
examination of alternatives to ReactJS. I also try to emphasise that the
actual sufficiently disqualifying problems with the ReactJS license are
with license incompatibility as opposed to some possibility of problems
over some scenari
de...@agogme.com]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 10:29 PM
To: koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
Subject: [Koha-devel] ReactJS license problems
Recently, people at the Apache Software Foundation have found that
software released by Facebook using the Facebook BSD+Patents license, such
as React
Recently, people at the Apache Software Foundation have found that
software released by Facebook using the Facebook BSD+Patents license, such
as ReactJs, has patent terms which are incompatible with patent terms in
Apache License version 2 (ALv2). Similar incompatibility seems to exist
for patent
