Re: [Koha-devel] RFC: Reverting MARC batches with deleted records

2015-06-23 Thread Christopher Davis
Hear here. Thank you, Christopher Davis, MLS Systems & E-Services Librarian Uintah County Library cgda...@uintah.utah.gov (435) 789-0091 ext.261 uintahlibrary.org basinlibraries.org facebook.com/uintahcountylibrary On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Kyle Hall wrote: > That is also my instinct. I

Re: [Koha-devel] RFC: Reverting MARC batches with deleted records

2015-06-23 Thread Kyle Hall
That is also my instinct. It's good to have some further confirmation! Kyle http://www.kylehall.info ByWater Solutions ( http://bywatersolutions.com ) Meadville Public Library ( http://www.meadvillelibrary.org ) Crawford County Federated Library System ( http://www.ccfls.org ) Mill Run Technology

Re: [Koha-devel] RFC: Reverting MARC batches with deleted records

2015-06-23 Thread Galen Charlton
Hi, On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Kyle Hall wrote: > The question becomes, is this the correct thing to do? If a record is > deleted, shouldn't it stay deleted? My gut reaction: it should stay deleted, as there was presumably some other intentional action taken at some point to delete it. R

[Koha-devel] RFC: Reverting MARC batches with deleted records

2015-06-23 Thread Kyle Hall
The batch record tool can A) overlay/replace existing records B) revert batches, including modifications due to overlays The situation becomes messy when we begin dealing with batches having overlaid records that are now deleted. If one of these batches is reverted, the record is un-deleted and th