Probably, we can close this thread now.
>>>It's quite simple -- I do not consider my job as being one of
>>>automatically pushing any patch that reaches the passed-QA status. I
>>> will
>>>take the time I need to review and test nearly [1] every patch, and in
>>>particular any l
Am 02.07.2013 21:30, schrieb Chris Cormack:
> * Galen Charlton (g...@esilibrary.com) wrote:
>>Hi,
>>On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Marcel de Rooy
>>wrote:
>>
>> Saw this note from Paul on bug 7167.
>> Probably, your answer may be of interest to more people. We can all see
>>
* Galen Charlton (g...@esilibrary.com) wrote:
>Hi,
>On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Marcel de Rooy
>wrote:
>
> Saw this note from Paul on bug 7167.
> Probably, your answer may be of interest to more people. We can all see
> 40 patches in that queue, but we do not know y
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Galen Charlton wrote:
>
> It's quite simple -- I do not consider my job as being one of
> automatically pushing any patch that reaches the passed-QA status. I will
> take the time I need to review and test nearly [1] every patch...
>
As somebody pointed out,
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Marcel de Rooy wrote:
> Saw this note from Paul on bug 7167.
> Probably, your answer may be of interest to more people. We can all see 40
> patches in that queue, but we do not know your strategy in handling them
> (apart from the fact that it is different from
Hi Galen,
Saw this note from Paul on bug 7167.
Probably, your answer may be of interest to more people. We can all see 40
patches in that queue, but we do not know your strategy in handling them (apart
from the fact that it is different from that of former RMs).
But I could have missed somethin
