Re: [Koha-devel] Koha namespace architecture - calls for discussions

2016-08-11 Thread Jonathan Druart
For the record: 2/ is on bug 16966 - Koha::Patrons - Move GetBorrowersWithIssuesHistoryOlderThan to search_patrons_to_anonymise and 3/ is on bug 17089 - Move the star ratings related code to Koha::Ratings 2016-07-21 12:20 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Druart : > Hi devs (me again), > > During the last dev

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha namespace architecture - calls for discussions

2016-07-24 Thread Katrin Fischer
> 5/ patronflags? > Any ideas what we could do with C4::Members::patronflags? :) Hm, maybe Koha::Patrons::Permissions? ___ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/k

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha namespace architecture - calls for discussions

2016-07-21 Thread Tomas Cohen Arazi
El jue., 21 jul. 2016 a las 8:20, Jonathan Druart (< jonathan.dru...@bugs.koha-community.org>) escribió: > Hi devs (me again), > > During the last dev meeting, we discussed about the naming of a new > module in our Koha namespace. The conclusion was to ask the ML in > order to get more ideas (as t

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha namespace architecture - calls for discussions

2016-07-21 Thread Marcel de Rooy
> 1/ Import stuffs modules > But we could imagine a generic Koha::Exporter|Importer modules with specific > Koha::Object[s?]::Export|Import modules. Sounds good to me: If Patron export needs some additional functionality, add Koha::Patron::Export on top of Koha::Exporter. > 2/ Move C4::Members::

[Koha-devel] Koha namespace architecture - calls for discussions

2016-07-21 Thread Jonathan Druart
Hi devs (me again), During the last dev meeting, we discussed about the naming of a new module in our Koha namespace. The conclusion was to ask the ML in order to get more ideas (as there was not a lot of attendees...). I'd like to take this opportunity to bring other architecture problems I faced

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha:: namespace

2012-06-11 Thread Kyle Hall
I agree, but the existing rules for the Koha namespace ( what I am calling Koha::BusinessLogic here ) do not require modules to be strictly OO, though it is recommended. For that reason, it is not part of the RFC. Perhaps we will need to discuss this as well. Kyle http://www.kylehall.info ByWater

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha:: namespace

2012-06-10 Thread Jared Camins-Esakov
Kyle, The writeup made perfect sense to me, and all of that sounds like a good idea, with one exception: there is nothing about business logic being object-oriented. Whenever possible, business logic code should be object-oriented too. At least, that's my thought. Regards, Jared On Sun, Jun 10,

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha:: namespace

2012-06-10 Thread Kyle Hall
I've written up our brainstorming session and put it on the wiki here: http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Koha_Namespace_RFC It is a bit difficult to put these ideas down in plain text, so I apologize if it is not very clear. Kyle http://www.kylehall.info ByWater Solutions ( http://bywatersoluti

[Koha-devel] Koha:: namespace

2012-06-09 Thread Jared Camins-Esakov
Good time of day (again!), I know Paul is going to be talking about the Koha:: namespace tomorrow, but since I can't be in KohaCon in person I wanted to share a few of my thoughts and maybe help him out with getting the conversation started. As part of the authority control improvements I'll be wo