Magnus Enger schreef op di 21-01-2014 om 11:17 [+0100]:
> - Attributes are less intrusive, they only need to be added to systems
> that want to sync with the Norwegian national patron database.
I'd tend to go towards attributes, but...
> - New columns could be re-used by others, to implement othe
I do believe use of DBIx::Class in existing subs is both good and
encouraged! That is, as long as there are no regressions! It seems like a
good idea to add that field to the borrowers table. I'm sure there are many
Koha administrators that need to sync data between Koha and other systems,
and it s
Hi!
I am working on Bug 11401 - Add support for Norwegian national library card:
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11401
The goal is to sync patrons in Koha back and forth to the Norwegian
national patron database. In order to do this I need to keep track of
- which patrons
Hie,
It works weel, but it would be more explicite/logic to use itemnumber in
HAVING :
SELECT
biblio.biblionumber,
CONCAT('href=\"/cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/detail.pl?biblionumber=',biblio.biblionumber,'\">',biblio.title,'')
AS title,
biblio.author,
GROUP_CONCAT(items.ccode SEPARATOR ',
++, thanks Galen
Le 10/01/2014 16:53, Tomas Cohen Arazi a écrit :
+1
I'm glad that you proposed that Galen, thanks!
To+
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Galen Charlton wrote:
Hi,
If you're writing a patch that fixes a bug with an OPAC template file,
you'll need to at least touch the Boot
