Le 27/11/2012 08:44, Vimal Kumar V. a écrit :
> Dear Friends,
>
> I upgraded Koha 3.8.6 to 3.10.
> I got the OPAC page seems weired.
> see the screenshot,
>
> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/EYE-GwXzFzJU4rxKxqOOpNMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink
It's probably that you switched to ccsr
On 27 November 2012 20:44, Vimal Kumar V. wrote:
> Dear Friends,
>
> I upgraded Koha 3.8.6 to 3.10.
> I got the OPAC page seems weired.
> see the screenshot,
>
> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/EYE-GwXzFzJU4rxKxqOOpNMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink
>
Do you have customised css or jque
Dear Friends,
I upgraded Koha 3.8.6 to 3.10.
I got the OPAC page seems weired.
see the screenshot,
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/EYE-GwXzFzJU4rxKxqOOpNMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink
I installed Koha from Ubuntu packages.
I installed all dependencies.
--
Vimal Kumar V.
Mahatma Ga
___
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
sorry
___
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
Just a test, sorry for the noise
___
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Paul Poulain wrote:
> bugzilla > Preferences > General Preferences > After changing a bug
> "Show the updated bug"
>
Thank you so much I thought it was just the way Koha's bugzilla was :)
Nicole
___
Koha-devel maili
> > Until now, we said the QA goal was to be concentrated on code quality,
> > testing the feature was made 'somewhere else'. (that's why I also think
> > we could have QA before or after signoff, that's 2 independant things.
> > But I don't see how to achieve that with bugzilla, so I never suggest
Hi Nicole,
check your permissions – there is a setting where you can change what happens
after you save a change.
Hope that helps,
Katrin
From: koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org
[mailto:koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org] On Behalf Of Nicole Engard
Sent: Mon
Le 26/11/2012 14:39, Nicole Engard a écrit :
> Right now when you comment on a bug in Bugzilla it saves your change and
> shows the next bug in the search on the screen. Often I need to make a
> couple edits and this makes me change the wrong bug report (an error
> I've seen others make as well).
Right now when you comment on a bug in Bugzilla it saves your change and
shows the next bug in the search on the screen. Often I need to make a
couple edits and this makes me change the wrong bug report (an error I've
seen others make as well). We have bugzilla set up at work to redirect you
back
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Fischer, Katrin
wrote:
> So the next question is, what can we do to be sure something works?
>
> - make sure the patch applies
> - make sure it passes all the tests
> - step through the coding guidelines and review the code
> - do functionality testing
> - add our
Thanks. I finally managed to change the status. Certainly complex :)
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Paul Poulain [mailto:paul.poul...@biblibre.com]
Verzonden: maandag 26 november 2012 11:08
Aan: Marcel de Rooy
CC: koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
Onderwerp: Re: FW: [Koha-devel] Changes
On 26 November 2012 23:13, Paul Poulain wrote:
> Le 26/11/2012 10:34, Chris Cormack a écrit :
>>> Until now, we said the QA goal was to be concentrated on code quality,
>>> testing the feature was made 'somewhere else'. (that's why I also think
>>> we could have QA before or after signoff, that's
Le 26/11/2012 10:34, Chris Cormack a écrit :
>> Until now, we said the QA goal was to be concentrated on code quality,
>> testing the feature was made 'somewhere else'. (that's why I also think
>> we could have QA before or after signoff, that's 2 independant things.
>> But I don't see how to achie
Le 26/11/2012 11:01, Marcel de Rooy a écrit :
> I added a patch manually. And cannot set the status to Needs signoff. That
> should really be made possible!
Not sure I try to do what you're doing but here is my test:
* open bug
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6473, that
I added a patch manually. And cannot set the status to Needs signoff. That
should really be made possible!
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Paul Poulain [mailto:paul.poul...@biblibre.com]
Verzonden: maandag 26 november 2012 10:59
Aan: Marcel de Rooy
Onderwerp: Re: FW: [Koha-devel] Changes
Le 26/11/2012 10:38, Marcel de Rooy a écrit :
> Cannot change status of a patch now.
mmm... did you choose something for the patch complexity ?
I just tested do do some changes with test bug
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6473
without any problem
--
Paul POULAIN - Asso
Le 26/11/2012 10:32, Paul Poulain a écrit :
> Hello,
I've updated the wiki:
http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Bug_Reporting_Guidelines#Severity
and
http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/SubmitingAPatch
--
Paul POULAIN - BibLibre
http://www.biblibre.com
Free & Open Source Softwares for libraries
K
Cannot change status of a patch now.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org
[mailto:koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org] Namens Paul Poulain
Verzonden: maandag 26 november 2012 10:32
Aan: Koha Devel
Onderwerp: [Koha-devel] Changes in Bugzilla
H
On 26 November 2012 22:27, Paul Poulain wrote:
> Le 26/11/2012 10:02, Fischer, Katrin a écrit :
>> So the next question is, what can we do to be sure something works?
>>
>> - make sure the patch applies
>> - make sure it passes all the tests
>> - step through the coding guidelines and review the c
Hello,
As I've suggested in previous mails, I made some changes in bugzilla:
* new severity "new feature". This is/will be for real new features.
The "enhancement" being for an existing feature. That will be useful for
generating Release Notes of 3.12 (I'll take care later of updating the
script)
Le 26/11/2012 10:02, Fischer, Katrin a écrit :
> So the next question is, what can we do to be sure something works?
>
> - make sure the patch applies
> - make sure it passes all the tests
> - step through the coding guidelines and review the code
> - do functionality testing
If we require that, i
Hi Marcel and Chris,
I think what you are discussing here is basically the definition of 'Passed
QA'. I think setting this status means, that I am sure that a patch works and
does not cause any regressions.
I would like QA team members only to set this status, if they are sure. Else
what we do
Le 26/11/2012 09:20, Marcel de Rooy a écrit :
> Jared,
> The additional signoff will mean more workload for the QA team, since it
> requires additional testing. Which is fine of course in theory, but may
> lead to a larger queue of patches waiting for QA, etc.
I agree that it's something we shoul
For me it feels more work. If I add a signoff, I must have tested the patch
more extensively. But if I do not need to add signoff and I can rely on a solid
signoff already, the QA process will be faster. Note that I do not oppose this
step, I am just warning that it takes more time. I do not fav
On 26 November 2012 21:25, Marcel de Rooy wrote:
> Testing is more than checking if it applies :)
Of course it is, but you can hardly QA something if you haven't even
applied it. My point is, applying a patch then doing your QA then
signing that patch off ... the only change is adding the sign of
Great !
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org
[mailto:koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org] Namens Paul Poulain
Verzonden: vrijdag 23 november 2012 17:34
Aan: Koha Devel; Koha-Mailinglist
Onderwerp: [Koha-devel] Koha 3.10.0 released
The Koha tea
Testing is more than checking if it applies :)
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Chris Cormack [mailto:ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz]
Verzonden: maandag 26 november 2012 9:24
Aan: Marcel de Rooy
CC: Jared Camins-Esakov; koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Koha-devel] [QA] QAing and
On 26 November 2012 21:20, Marcel de Rooy wrote:
> Jared,
>
> Could have missed something, but was this decided recently?
>
> The additional signoff will mean more workload for the QA team, since it
> requires additional testing. Which is fine of course in theory, but may lead
> to a larger queue
Jared,
Could have missed something, but was this decided recently?
The additional signoff will mean more workload for the QA team, since it
requires additional testing. Which is fine of course in theory, but may lead to
a larger queue of patches waiting for QA, etc.
Marcel
Van: koha-devel-boun.
31 matches
Mail list logo
