Re: [Koha-devel] Officially supported OS versions

2012-08-17 Thread Marc Balmer
another +1 for debian stable and oldstable -- Marc Balmer micro systems, http://www.msys.ch/ Tel. +41 61 383 05 10, Fax +41 61 383 05 12 Am 17.08.2012 um 23:22 schrieb Mason James : > > On 2012-08-18, at 4:31 AM, Galen Charlton wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 08/17/2012 10:57 AM, Ian Walls wrote: >

Re: [Koha-devel] Officially supported OS versions

2012-08-17 Thread Tomas Cohen Arazi
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Ian Walls wrote: > Koha Developers, > > > As I try to get back in the swing of things after a long absence, I'm > finding a lot of changes to Koha's dependencies to be particularly > frustrating, as I need to add new package repositories or even upgrade my > OS. >

Re: [Koha-devel] Officially supported OS versions

2012-08-17 Thread Mason James
On 2012-08-18, at 4:31 AM, Galen Charlton wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/17/2012 10:57 AM, Ian Walls wrote: >> As I try to get back in the swing of things after a long absence, I'm >> finding a lot of changes to Koha's dependencies to be particularly >> frustrating, as I need to add new package reposito

Re: [Koha-devel] Officially supported OS versions

2012-08-17 Thread Chris Nighswonger
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Mark Tompsett wrote: > In the past some people have exerted much effort trying to get it to > run under Windows. Frankly, I use virtualbox with a wired connection as a > bridged adapter, no need to get it to run natively. And again, I use Ubuntu > on my VMs. The

Re: [Koha-devel] Officially supported OS versions

2012-08-17 Thread Mark Tompsett
Greetings, I suggest targeting the current and the immediate previous LTS, with the LTS third-back being optional. I would suggest we don't go back the third LTS. Don't even acknowledge it. It's dead next year. Koha is newer than that. The further we go back, the more we have to support. Fro

Re: [Koha-devel] Officially supported OS versions

2012-08-17 Thread Mark Tompsett
Greetings, I am an Ubuntu user. Koha runs well under 10.04 (3.6.x) and 12.04 (3.6.x, 3.8.x), though there are some quirks for the dependencies. This is remedied by taking the appropriate “add a repo step” in wiki page here: http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Koha_3.8_on_Debian_Squeeze#To_use I

Re: [Koha-devel] Officially supported OS versions

2012-08-17 Thread Marcel de Rooy
I am running on FC16. (But with some manual cpan installing sometimes..) Currently, often new dependencies creep quite silently into Koha. PerlDependencies.pm is updated afterwards in a followup or so. Developers later on stumble over it while git-fetching and upgrading. I agree that we could

Re: [Koha-devel] Officially supported OS versions

2012-08-17 Thread Galen Charlton
Hi, On 08/17/2012 10:57 AM, Ian Walls wrote: As I try to get back in the swing of things after a long absence, I'm finding a lot of changes to Koha's dependencies to be particularly frustrating, as I need to add new package repositories or even upgrade my OS. As a data point for your descripti

[Koha-devel] Officially supported OS versions

2012-08-17 Thread Ian Walls
Koha Developers, As I try to get back in the swing of things after a long absence, I'm finding a lot of changes to Koha's dependencies to be particularly frustrating, as I need to add new package repositories or even upgrade my OS. This leads me to the question: What OS versions does Koha run o