Paul Poulain
> In this case (speaking as RM here, not as owner of the company
> submitting the patch ;-) ), it should just be "passed QA", as it passes
> the 3 questions: don't break existing behaviour, do what it announces,
> consistent with existing feature & code. (double check if there can be
Tomas Cohen Arazi
> I think functionality should be included in C4 or Koha, and exposed by
> both command-line tool and templated front-ends. Also, any
> command-line tool should honour system preferences by default, and the
> user be warned if using parameters others than default.
I agree with t
> What should the manual say about the cron job? If it's not required
> then I can say that, but I know that it's still there so I assume it
> can be used and should be documented.
Take a look at:
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6094
and my comment:
http://bugs.koha-c
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Galen Charlton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Such an attack may be more theoretical than real, but my preference would
> be that if a script's logic should be accessible from the command line and
> the web interface, to put the logic in the API and have the CGI and CLI
> scri
On 13 December 2011 06:11, LAURENT Henri-Damien wrote:
>>
> Hi,
> in my opinion, it is not "dual-purpose" script,
> command-line or web interface, it is the same process you want.
> duplicating code and editing to make the code commandline compliant
> would be far harder to maintain and keep sync
Le 12/12/2011 17:24, Ian Walls a écrit :
> My difficulty with this patch is that it sets precedent for implementing
> both commandline and staff client interfaces for a single script. Up
> until now, that's not be the case (as far as my research has shown;
> counter-examples welcome). I just thin
Hi,
On 12/12/2011 11:24 AM, Ian Walls wrote:
My difficulty with this patch is that it sets precedent for implementing
both commandline and staff client interfaces for a single script. Up
until now, that's not be the case (as far as my research has shown;
counter-examples welcome). I just think
Ian,
My difficulty with this patch is that it sets precedent for implementing
> both commandline and staff client interfaces for a single script. Up until
> now, that's not be the case (as far as my research has shown;
> counter-examples welcome). I just think we need, for consistency sake, to
>
I need some assistance in documenting this preference:
http://manual.koha-community.org/3.6/en/administration.html#dontmerge
It says that the cron is required, but apparently its not:
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7347
What should the manual say about the cron job? If
Le 12/12/2011 17:24, Ian Walls a écrit :
> My difficulty with this patch is that it sets precedent for implementing
> both commandline and staff client interfaces for a single script. Up
> until now, that's not be the case (as far as my research has shown;
> counter-examples welcome). I just thin
Hello (chris_c & others)
Jenkins is back to unstable, because of XISBN.t test.
build 562 was stable, and 563 is not, and I can't see where the problem
can come from.
BREAKING NEWS : (just before sending this mail) build 565 is stable
again. The patch I pushed can't explain why we're stable. I'm r
My difficulty with this patch is that it sets precedent for implementing
both commandline and staff client interfaces for a single script. Up until
now, that's not be the case (as far as my research has shown;
counter-examples welcome). I just think we need, for consistency sake, to
either make t
Le 12/12/2011 14:06, Marcel de Rooy a écrit :
> Hi all,
> Patch 5636 should be next in passing qa now, but these questions
> remained open:
> Style question to the community: should core pages in the staff client
> (like
>
> tools/cleanborrowers.pl) have both a templated page in the staff client
2011/12/12 Marcel de Rooy :
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Patch 5636 should be next in passing qa now, but these questions remained
> open:
>
>
>
> Style question to the community: should core pages in the staff client
> (like
>
> tools/cleanborrowers.pl) have both a templated page in the staff client AND
> a
Hi all,
Il 12/12/2011 14:06, Marcel de Rooy ha scritto:
> Patch 5636 should be next in passing qa now, but these questions remained
> open:
>
> Style question to the community: should core pages in the staff client (like
> tools/cleanborrowers.pl) have both a templated page in the staff client
Hi all,
Patch 5636 should be next in passing qa now, but these questions remained open:
Style question to the community: should core pages in the staff client (like
tools/cleanborrowers.pl) have both a templated page in the staff client AND a
command-line presence, or should the commandline tool
Just to mention another patch that I wrote myself ;)
6536 Z3950 Enhancements: SRU targets, MARC conversion, additional XSLT
processing
The functionality patch dates from June 30, but still applies. (We use it in
production for 6 months now already!)
The dbrev patch has been rebased last time
17 matches
Mail list logo
