Le 02/03/2011 01:03, Tiago Murakami a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I test an adaptation of Fluid 960 Grid System (
> http://www.designinfluences.com/fluid960gs ) with Koha 3.2.5 and I
> have great results on my test OPAC ( http://minhabiblioteca.com/ or
> http://109.123.108.51/ ). The Fluid 960 Grid System is
Hi,
I test an adaptation of Fluid 960 Grid System (
http://www.designinfluences.com/fluid960gs ) with Koha 3.2.5 and I have
great results on my test OPAC ( http://minhabiblioteca.com/ or
http://109.123.108.51/ ). The Fluid 960 Grid System is more flexible than
Yahoo UI.
Its possible to think about
I had an idea about this recently. Perhaps it is possible to have in the
items table a MARCXML column which stores the MARC just for the items, and
have that be seperate from the biblio's MARCXML. Then we the record is sent
to the zebra server combine the two, so that zebra still has all the
info
Paul,
This would be fantastic. Being a state government archives, our
collections grow over time, and some of them very quickly. I've been
frantically trying to split some of them out in ways that make sense,
but sometimes, splitting just limits accessibility.
On 3/1/2011 3:50 PM, Paul Poula
Le 01/03/2011 18:31, MJ Ray a écrit :
> My notes say that RFC was created by a LibLime worker, so a current or
> former LibLime worker may have a definitive answer... BUT:
>
> I suspect it may have been abandoned because one of the MARC fields is
> sent to the Zebra index server and there are benef
Can anyone tell me if Evergreen has a similar problem?
Thanks in advance.
On 3/1/2011 11:31 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
Linda Culberson asked:
There is an "abandoned RFC" for "Stop copying item records to bib's MARC
and MARCXML RFC" .
Could someone tell me why this was abandoned, because I think having
Linda Culberson asked:
> There is an "abandoned RFC" for "Stop copying item records to bib's MARC
> and MARCXML RFC" .
>
> Could someone tell me why this was abandoned, because I think having the
> item record data exists both in the items table and as MARC fields in
> the bib record is an a te
There is an "abandoned RFC" for "Stop copying item records to bib's MARC
and MARCXML RFC" .
Could someone tell me why this was abandoned, because I think having the
item record data exists both in the items table and as MARC fields in
the bib record is an a terrible shortcoming of Koha for aca
Hi
BibLibre is willing to take the hat.
We will dedicate a machine for that.
The machine should be up in the afternoon (in France)
and chris will have a user on that machine so that every action he needs
to do will be available for him.
I propose that any release manager/maintainer could be granted
