Hi,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Colin Campbell
wrote:
> On 25/11/10 12:51, Marcel de Rooy wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I would welcome any input from you on the following proposed patch.
> I wonder if rather than having the option as SkipBasketConfirmation it
> should be BasketConfirmation so that it co
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Paul Poulain
wrote:
> I fully agree with Nicole : it's very handy to have everything in the
> mail ! (Nicole, it's me that asked, and got the RSS Answer)
There are quite a few services and software packages that can convert
RSS feeds to email. Jes' saying.
Le 26/11/2010 16:55, Nicole Engard a écrit :
> PS. I used to do the RSS feed and the emails were much easier to go
> through than the feed because it was everything in one email instead
> of having to click through 50 commit messages. There was another
> reason I didn't like the RSS feed, but I do
PS. I used to do the RSS feed and the emails were much easier to go
through than the feed because it was everything in one email instead
of having to click through 50 commit messages. There was another
reason I didn't like the RSS feed, but I don't remember what it was.
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10
Is that your way of saying it's not possible to get this in the email?
Nicole
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Galen Charlton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Nicole Engard wrote:
>> I think this was brought up before but how do I know what has changed
>> in these files? Comm
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Nicole Engard wrote:
> I think this was brought up before but how do I know what has changed
> in these files? Commit emails that tell me bug numbers and a short
> title/summary are much more helpful than this. I use these emails to
> determine what to updat
I think this was brought up before but how do I know what has changed
in these files? Commit emails that tell me bug numbers and a short
title/summary are much more helpful than this. I use these emails to
determine what to update in the manual and I can't keep track if I
have to go hunt down thes
Hi,
as I spotted in previous email some design flaws (in my opinion) in
Authentication.
>> It gets
>> > worse if you consider changes such as adding or modifying an
>> > authentication module, for which the default configuration changes are
>> > almost invariably associated with code changes.
> Sam
Le 24/11/2010 18:13, Fridolyn SOMERS a écrit :
> Little up.
> Any feedback is welcome.
In my opinion, since you ask, it may really slow down the process of
displaying results.
And it still would not be True facets.
Since it just takes more records. If you have more than 500 hundred
records returned
Hi
During KohaCon, Plack and Data persistance was discussed and wome work
was done on that.
Ian posted a perl script.
Marc did another script. It works quite fast.
I wanted to publicise this in order to contribute code so that
eventually all the circular references could be solved.
Find enclosed bo
I think we need another option or different way of ordering for orders
of serials/electronic journals/databases etc.
Perhaps a checkbox 'don't create item(s) for this order' would be a
possibility. And being able to edit the quantity in this case.
So you can order something without being forced
On 26/11/10 11:39, Fischer, Katrin wrote:
> Perhaps this behaviour should be an option.
>
> - delete items automatically when cancelling
> - do not delete items when cancelling an order
Deletion of biblio as well strikes me as counter productive, very often
the site may want the biblio even altho
Perhaps this behaviour should be an option.
- delete items automatically when cancelling
- do not delete items when cancelling an order
When does the deletion happen?
- when I cancel an order (from receive screen after I closed the basket)
- when I delete single titles from an order (leave open
Le 26/11/2010 12:06, Colin Campbell a écrit :
> Hi,
> I'm just looking at the branch of acquisitions fixes from Biblibre one
> fix in there is an addition to DelOrder to delete any items associated
> with the order on its deletion. However it goes further and deletes the
> associated bib record i
Hi,
I'm just looking at the branch of acquisitions fixes from Biblibre one
fix in there is an addition to DelOrder to delete any items associated
with the order on its deletion. However it goes further and deletes the
associated bib record if it has no items. thus:
> diff --git a/C4/Acquisition.p
15 matches
Mail list logo
