[Koha] Koha 3.16.3 search

Hello all, Koha 3.16.3 search not accurate for example searching the following Arabic phrase مدخل الى تنمية الموارد البشرية مع دراسة الواقع في الدول العربية returns (مدخل الى علم الاثار) as the first result, and couldn't see the exact phrase ( مدخل الى تنمية الموارد البشرية مع دراسة الواقع في

Re: [Koha] Intranet Edit help encoding problem

It's a bug, I have just submitted a patch on bug 14813. Please test. 2015-09-07 11:11 GMT+01:00 Abdulsalam Yousef : > Hello all, > > We have installed koha 3.20.3, When trying to edit help in Arabic interface > it shows garbage like this: > > ٠رحباً بك٠٠ي ÙƒÙiˆÙ‡Ø§ > > إذا كانت Ù

Re: [Koha] Big Collection

Really thanks a lot for your inputs guys! We were somehow able to optimize the server and it no longer receive errors. However the loading still loads too long. For a 50,000 search result it takes around 20-25 seconds. We are now planning to move to Percona as per advice here http://wiki.koha-com

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.20.3 UTF-8 Problems

See bug 14813 and bug 14817. 2015-09-08 6:35 GMT+01:00 Abdulsalam Yousef : > Hello All, > > Koha 3.20.3 suffers from UTF-8 Problems in some pages such as, When trying > to edit help in > Arabic interface > it shows garbage like this: > > ٠رحباً بك٠٠ي ÙƒÙiˆÙ‡Ø§ >

[Koha] System generated field 001 control number

Hi! As MARC manual say about control number *"Field 001 may be system generated"* we wish Koha generate this number (lastUsed++), to avoid creating manually and periodically having to run a report to remove duplicates (from wiki

Re: [Koha] System generated field 001 control number

Hi, Pablo-- I'm not really sure what you're asking--we use the 001 for a unique bibliographic control number, which for us is the OCLC record number. Are you saying that you wish Koha could automatically generate a unique control number in the 001? Would you use this differently from the Koha re

Re: [Koha] System generated field 001 control number

Hi ​Heather, On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Hernandez, ​​ Heather wrote: > Hi, Pablo-- > > I'm not really sure what you're asking--we use the 001 for a unique > bibliographic control number, which for us is the OCLC record number. > ​ We wish to have 001 as unique bibliographic control number,

Re: [Koha] Koha Digest, Vol 119, Issue 23

Hi Pablo: While I agree that the 001 should be populated with a unique bibliographic control number, it's not the way that Koha is typically set up. In theory, it's configurable, but there are parts of Koha that expect the biblionumber to be in the 999$c field (e.g. MARC21slim2OPACResult.xsl).