Re: [Koha] On the choice of MARC-format

Good question! Check your UKRMARC. Where is your title proper? 245(MARC21) or 200(UNIMARC). Your MARC choice must keep harmony with Z39.50 copy cataloguing. Taiwan libraries choose MARC21, because Taiwan's Z39.50 servers provide MARC21 records only. However China libraries have to choose UNIMARC

Re: [Koha] On the choice of MARC-format

I've always seen Marc21 records used. I don't know the technical differences nor how hard it would be to convert to UKRMARC. Phillip > From: zo...@imath.kiev.ua > To: Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz > Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 14:05:58 +0400 > Subject: [Koha] On the choice of MARC-format > > Hello all,

Re: [Koha] On the choice of MARC-format

Hi, Il 12/05/2014 12:05, zolot ha scritto: "Koha 3.14. Manual (en)" considers "MARC", "MARC21" and "UNIMARC". What principle differences exist between these formats ? My database (i.e. isis-catalog, 100 000 records) has been created in accordance with Ukrainian standard "UKRMARC". What of the

Re: [Koha] On the choice of MARC-format

Hi Gennady, seems that UKRMARC it's based on UNIMARC Perhaps this link can be useful [1] Regards, Bernardo [1] http://library.lviv.ua/e-library/library_standarts/UkrMarc/index.shtml -- Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel bgkrie...@gmail.com On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:05 AM, zolot wrote: > Hello all