Re: [Koha] System generated field 001 control number

We use 999$c to match our records (most of which don't have ISBN). This is especially important when we've had to edit a batch offline and re-upload them. On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Iming Chan wrote: > Does this mean we can use MARC 999$c or 999$d for record matching and > merging > purp

Re: [Koha] System generated field 001 control number

Does this mean we can use MARC 999$c or 999$d for record matching and merging purpose during import, as it didn't seem to work properly when we first start to use Koha a while back. At this moment, we manually enter Koha record number found in 999$c into 001, while OCLC number is swapped to 035

Re: [Koha] System generated field 001 control number

-org - List Subject: Re: [Koha] System generated field 001 control number Hi David, ​​On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:37 PM, David Cook mailto:dc...@prosentient.com.au> > wrote: While I agree that the 001 should be populated with a unique bibliographic control number, it's not the way t

Re: [Koha] System generated field 001 control number

Hi Pablo, maybe using a catalouging plugin for 001 could be a solution. There are some plugins for the stocknumber/inventory number field in the item, that are made to autogenerate different kinds of sequential numbers, that could be a starting point for this. stocknumberAV.pl, for example, uses

Re: [Koha] System generated field 001 control number

Hi David, ​​On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:37 PM, David Cook wrote: > > While I agree that the 001 should be populated with a unique bibliographic > control number, it's not the way that Koha is typically set up. Yet for example on Koha demo of Catalyst IT Ltd. (New Zealand) we can find this recor

Re: [Koha] System generated field 001 control number

Hi ​Heather, On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Hernandez, ​​ Heather wrote: > Hi, Pablo-- > > I'm not really sure what you're asking--we use the 001 for a unique > bibliographic control number, which for us is the OCLC record number. > ​ We wish to have 001 as unique bibliographic control number,

Re: [Koha] System generated field 001 control number

Hi, Pablo-- I'm not really sure what you're asking--we use the 001 for a unique bibliographic control number, which for us is the OCLC record number. Are you saying that you wish Koha could automatically generate a unique control number in the 001? Would you use this differently from the Koha re

[Koha] System generated field 001 control number

Hi! As MARC manual say about control number *"Field 001 may be system generated"* we wish Koha generate this number (lastUsed++), to avoid creating manually and periodically having to run a report to remove duplicates (from wiki