Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4

2019-04-02 Thread Philippe Blouin
Be reassured, your cataloguing done since last week is not lost. You should be able to dump the records in a MARC file and reimport it in the newer version rather easily. As well, having very recently done an upgrade from 3.0.2 simply using the Koha upgrade tool, I'd be very optimistic about y

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4

2019-04-01 Thread Chris Cormack
Hi Luisa I would stop now, the last 3.4 release was 7 years ago, it is very very out of date. And upgrading from a version that old will be very hard. If you haven't catalogued much already I would start with a new install of 18.11.04 and start with that. Chris On 2/04/19 11:17 am, Luisa Korodr

[Koha] Koha 3.4

2019-04-01 Thread Luisa Korodrau
Dear Koha Community, Need help. I have only just been appointed as Librarian to a Theological library and we have just installed Koha 3.4 to automate the collection and as of last week I have started cataloguing the 15,000 resources that we currently have. I need technical advise whether I should

[Koha] Koha 3.4 packages uploading

2011-07-14 Thread Robin Sheat
Right now, the packages for Koha 3.4.2-1 are uploading to the repository. Versions of this were in the squeeze-dev repository for a while with no complaints, so I assume that means everything was OK. (Also, we've been running them here for a while with no real issues.) One important thing to note

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-06-21 Thread MJ Ray
Mahesh T Pai wrote: > MJ Ray writes: > > using koha_perl_deps.pl which does show what is required and > > what is optional. Splitting debian.packages in two would be > > a bigger job and I'm not sure if it's worthwhile, but have a > > go if you think it is. > > How about a .deb metapackage a

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-06-20 Thread Mahesh T Pai
MJ Ray writes: > using koha_perl_deps.pl which does show what is required and > what is optional. Splitting debian.packages in two would be > a bigger job and I'm not sure if it's worthwhile, but have a > go if you think it is. How about a .deb metapackage as a part of the koha tarball, whi

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-06-20 Thread MJ Ray
Mahesh T Pai wrote: > I would certainly appreciate if the dependencies were grouped by > "absolutely required"; and "X is required if you enable (or want > functionality kX) kX", where kX is an option within Koha. I've submitted a patch for INSTALL.debian which will suggest using koha_perl_deps.pl

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-06-19 Thread Chris Cormack
On 20 Jun 2011 18:16, "Mahesh T Pai" wrote: > > aj...@maxenna.com writes: > > > Initially I added the following lines to ports.conf. > > > > Listen 80 > > Listen 8080 > > NameVirtualHost*:80 > > NameVirtualHost*:8080 > > "NameVirtualHost" is not configuration to be set in ports.conf > > It sh

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-06-19 Thread Mahesh T Pai
aj...@maxenna.com writes: > Initially I added the following lines to ports.conf. > > Listen 80 > Listen 8080 > NameVirtualHost*:80 > NameVirtualHost*:8080 "NameVirtualHost" is not configuration to be set in ports.conf It should be set in koha-httpd.conf; and the installer would have done it

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-06-19 Thread update
Hi Ajesh, I experience the exactly the same problems as described in the points 1 and 2. Have you solved it and how? Sincerly Alen -- View this message in context: http://koha.1045719.n5.nabble.com/Koha-3-4-on-Ubuntu-tp4333084p4503118.html Sent from the Koha - Discuss mailing list archive at Na

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 OpacHiddenItems continued

2011-06-08 Thread Nicole Engard
2011/6/8 Robin Sheat : > Also, is this filtering powered by zebra, in which case a reindex (or at > least a regular index) may be needed? I tried that :) a reindex. Nicole ___ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://l

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 OpacHiddenItems continued

2011-06-08 Thread Robin Sheat
Nicole Engard schreef op wo 08-06-2011 om 08:55 [-0400]: > And I have a very small collection since it's a test system and so > every bib with an item attached is a BK. I do have EBK but they don't > have items attached. Do we know if this is looking at the biblio item > type or the item item typ

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 OpacHiddenItems continued

2011-06-08 Thread Nicole Engard
I do have BK in my itemtypes table: mysql> select * from itemtypes; +--+--+--++--+-+ | itemtype | description | rentalcharge | notforloan | imageurl | summary | +--+

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 OpacHiddenItems continued

2011-06-08 Thread Linda Culberson
Nicole, I'm sure that you have an entry in your itemtypes.itemtype that is 'BK' and I'm positive you have a branchcode that is "NIC" as well as having an items.itype=BK and a items.homebranch=NIC. Do you have something you could do a test with that isn't the majority of your items? Maybe if

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 OpacHiddenItems continued

2011-06-08 Thread Nicole Engard
Okay I tried it on my system with just itype: [BK] And nothing was hidden. I tried it with itype: [BK] homebranch: [NIC] And still everything showed So I'm at a loss here. Nicole On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Nicole Engard wrote: > It might :) I'll have to re-read it tomorrow when m

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 OpacHiddenItems continued

2011-06-07 Thread Nicole Engard
It might :) I'll have to re-read it tomorrow when my brain has refreshed :) Thanks! On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Linda Culberson wrote: > Nicole, > Does this help? > My OpacHiddentems looks like: > > itype: [07, 10] > location: [STAFF, ISO] > > In items my items.itype  07 is defined in  Item

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 OpacHiddenItems continued

2011-06-07 Thread Linda Culberson
Nicole, Does this help? My OpacHiddentems looks like: itype: [07, 10] location: [STAFF, ISO] In items my items.itype 07 is defined in Item Types Administration as Staff Assigned My items.itype 10 in Item Types is Archival Copy The locations STAFF and ISO are in Authoritized Values for categor

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 OpacHiddenItems continued

2011-06-07 Thread Nicole Engard
Can you give us a sample with your data in it, cause that document really isn't helpful to me at all, I'm not following what it wants me to do. Nicole On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Linda Culberson wrote: > I got the information from docs/opac/OpacHiddenItems.txt  and just took at > stab at it.

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 OpacHiddenItems continued

2011-06-07 Thread Linda Culberson
I got the information from docs/opac/OpacHiddenItems.txt and just took at stab at it. Those item types (itypes) I listed no longer appear in the opac - so I think it works. like in OpacHiddenItems.txt It indicates you can use any field in the items table: > The OpacHiddenItems syspref allow the

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 OpacHiddenItems continued

2011-06-07 Thread Nicole Engard
I also did not get any responses when I asked on list after the feature was pushed to Koha ... this is why it's not in the manual either :( Nicole On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Linda Culberson wrote: > Sharon, > I didn't get a response, but I seem to have gotten it to work in Koha 3.4. > Mine

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 OpacHiddenItems continued

2011-06-07 Thread Linda Culberson
Sharon, I didn't get a response, but I seem to have gotten it to work in Koha 3.4. Mine is like: itype: [07, 10, 14, 15] location: [STAFF, ISO] because those are the item types and locations we don't want to appear in the OPAC Hope that helps. On 6/7/2011 4:05 PM, Sharon Moreland wrote: > Hi

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 OpacHiddenItems continued

2011-06-07 Thread Sharon Moreland
Hi Linda and Koha folks, Was the mystery of the OpacHiddenItems syspref ever solved? We opened the associated document and added the necessary items and values (http://screencast.com/t/YEpkHriOQ) but our Withdrawn items remained visible in the OPAC. I didn't find any open bug tix related to this

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4: z39.50 public server configuration

2011-05-15 Thread Magnus Enger
Hi! I think your problem is described here: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5667 There is a signed off patch for this, so hopefully it will be fixed in 3.4.1. Basically, if you want to fix it yourself, you need to *copy* this part of the config: ... ... and change

[Koha] Koha 3.4: z39.50 public server configuration

2011-05-14 Thread Abdul Vali
Hi I've installed Koha 3.4. I want to enable my server as public z39.50 server. I have the following config file: === tcp:@: tcp:@:9998 tcp:@: /var/lib/koha/zebradb/biblios /etc/koha/zebradb/zebra-biblios.cfg /etc/koha/zebradb/pqf.propert

[Koha] Koha 3.4: Branch not setting in Label Creator

2011-05-10 Thread Abdul Vali
Dear Koha Community I have upgraded to Koha 3.4 but I'm unable to use the Label Creator. Whenever I create new batch or manage existing batch it says: *WARNING:* An error was encountered and items(s) not added, the error was: Branch is not set, you please set your branch before adding items to a

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-04-25 Thread Tomas Cohen Arazi
Please, create a new mail thread for each topic you want to discuss, with a proper subject, so people interested in that specific topic knows in its mailbox what it is about. regards To+ On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:29 AM, wrote: > Hi All, > >  Thanks to everyone for the support so far. > >  I ha

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-04-25 Thread ajesh
Hi All, Thanks to everyone for the support so far. I have successfully installed Koha3.4.0 on Ubuntu. I have a query. Is there a starter's guide available(any links or pdf's). Like how to start using Koha step by step. Something that might be a little simpler than http://koha.org/documentat

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-04-24 Thread Tomas Cohen Arazi
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:03 AM, wrote: > > Initially I added the following lines to ports.conf. > > Listen 80 > Listen 8080 > NameVirtualHost*:80 > NameVirtualHost*:8080 Spaces are needed between 'NameVirtualHost' and the rest of the lines (i.e. *:80) NameVirtualHost *:80 NameVirtualHost *:8080

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-04-24 Thread Chris Cormack
You are much better off using the INSTALL files that come in the tarball, INSTALL.ubuntu in your case. That error you are getting looks like you haven't set up the mysql user to match the username and password you chose when running perl Makefile.PL Chris On 24 Apr 2011 19:50, wrote: > Proceedin

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-04-24 Thread ajesh
Proceeding further and after carefully executing the last few steps mentioned at http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Koha_on_Ubuntu when I try to open http://127.0.1.1:8080/, I am seeing this *** Software error: Access denied for user 'k

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-04-24 Thread ajesh
Initially I added the following lines to ports.conf. Listen 80 Listen 8080 NameVirtualHost*:80 NameVirtualHost*:8080 Then on executing the command >> sudo apache2ctl restart * Syntax error on line 10 of /etc/apache2/ports.conf: Invalid command

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-04-22 Thread Galen Charlton
Hi, On Apr 22, 2011, at 10:43 AM, aj...@maxenna.com wrote: > I am not sure why, could somebody let me know why I am getting this error. In addition to double-checking the steps that Arturo mentioned, if Koha is the only web app on your server, you may also want to disable the default site: sudo

Re: [Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-04-22 Thread Arturo Ochoa
Looks like you need this commands : sudo ln -s /etc/koha/koha-httpd.conf /etc/apache2/sites-available/koha * # sudo gedit /etc/apache2/ports.conf * *add* * * Listen 80 Listen 8080 NameVirtualHost*:80 NameVirtualHost*:8080 * then # sudo a2enmod rewrite # sudo a2enmod deflate # sudo a2ensi

[Koha] Koha 3.4 on Ubuntu

2011-04-22 Thread ajesh
Hi, I am trying to install Koha3.4 on Ubuntu OS. I believe I was successfully able to complete the installation, following the steps at http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Koha_on_Ubuntu But when I try to access the below address, I am getting error http://127.0.1.1/ ***

[Koha] Koha 3.4 OpacHiddenItems continued

2011-04-21 Thread Linda Culberson
I'm terribly sorry, we had an alarm go off, and I apparently hit send before I finished my message. We need to know about OpacHiddenItems in 3.4 because in 3.2 we are using Lost to hide items in the opac. We don't like having something marked "LOST" when we know it isn't and and are very deter