Re: [Koha] Koha Debian packages for 18.05.02 and 17.11.08 are up

Thank you for your detailed answer. I see in Debian 9 repositories that nothing else than Koha depends on libhttp-oai-perl ; then this means that package's dependencies should sure better this. The order of specified dependencies in package matters: Instead of*: libhttp-oai-perl (>= 3.2) | libhtt

Re: [Koha] [EXTERNAL] NCIP User Question - biblionum in 001 vs 999c

On 2018-07-26 05:34 PM, Kelly Drake wrote: [snip] Heather and Paul A - Does an ex-maritime librarian count? I used to work in the library at Mystic Seaport! Yup... Paul O'P is an old friend of mine. Best -- Paul (another one.) Kelly On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Joy Nelson wrote: Hi

Re: [Koha] [EXTERNAL] NCIP User Question - biblionum in 001 vs 999c

I'm pretty sure that I've seen Heather up-shift, down-shift and double-clutch her pearls, which I suspect individually milled from high carbon steel and inspected daily with a micrometer for wear. ;-) On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 5:38 PM, Heather Hernandez < heather_hernan...@nps.gov> wrote: > Hi, Kel

Re: [Koha] [EXTERNAL] NCIP User Question - biblionum in 001 vs 999c

Hi, Kelly!! I *thought* your name was familiar!! How nice to be in touch!! Once a maritime library worker, always a maritime library worker?? (There's a joke in there about salt, but I need more coffee to make it!) Glad you're in touch with Joy--she has simply *mad* MARC record skillz!! Lucki

Re: [Koha] [EXTERNAL] NCIP User Question - biblionum in 001 vs 999c

Hi Everyone! Thank you for all the input. Joy - we'll be talking! Heather - I do hope your pearls have weathered this storm Heather and Paul A - Does an ex-maritime librarian count? I used to work in the library at Mystic Seaport! Kelly On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Joy Nelson wrote: >

[Koha] Development in Progress - Rental Fees based on Time Period

Hi, all! We recently funded a development that allows rental fees based on time period as opposed to flat fees for each item type. Our plan is to use this to smooth out our workflow when checking out Wi-Fi Hotspots to our patrons. It’s Bug #20912 - https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/sho

Re: [Koha] [EXTERNAL] NCIP User Question - biblionum in 001 vs 999c

Hi Kelly and Heather! In many other ILS systems the 001 was/is indeed a field that contained a unique value (control number). I still work with data from time to time that has a unique id in the 001. Heather is right that in Koha the unique id is stored in the 999$c, so you can use the 001 field

Re: [Koha] [EXTERNAL] NCIP User Question - biblionum in 001 vs 999c

Actually, that's the leader. The 001 field is documented here: http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd001.html Paul. On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 04:06:50PM -0400, Paul A wrote: > I'm not sure where this thread is going, but from one "maritime" library to > another, the 001 is defined at >

Re: [Koha] [EXTERNAL] NCIP User Question - biblionum in 001 vs 999c

I'm not sure where this thread is going, but from one "maritime" library to another, the 001 is defined at and shouldn't have anything to do with biblio numbers (which are stored in 999$c as far as Koha is concerned and are used relationally

Re: [Koha] Koha Debian packages for 18.05.02 and 17.11.08 are up

The problem is that Debian 9 ships libhttp-oai-perl in a version that won't work with Koha. So as a temporary workaround we use a custom package, libhttp-oai-3.27-perl. Check https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20800 for more details. The conflict is intended. You cannot have

Re: [Koha] Koha Debian packages for 18.05.02 and 17.11.08 are up

I didn't a full OS upgrade since Koha 18.05 appeared in repositories. $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux 9.4 (stretch) Release:9.4 Codename: stretch El 26/07/18 a les 20:16, Tomas Cohen Arazi ha escrit: > Did you d

Re: [Koha] Koha Debian packages for 18.05.02 and 17.11.08 are up

Did you do a full operating system upgrade? El jue., 26 jul. 2018 a las 15:13, Narcis Garcia () escribió: > I see that workaround at > https://lists.katipo.co.nz/public/koha/2018-May/050652.html > (thank you) > > ...but there is a package dependencies problem anyway. > I'm not in a hurry to upgra

Re: [Koha] Koha Debian packages for 18.05.02 and 17.11.08 are up

It works fine here. I think it's something local to your setup Chris On 27 July 2018 6:12:07 AM NZST, Narcis Garcia wrote: >I see that workaround at >https://lists.katipo.co.nz/public/koha/2018-May/050652.html >(thank you) > >...but there is a package dependencies problem anyway. >I'm not in a

Re: [Koha] Koha Debian packages for 18.05.02 and 17.11.08 are up

I see that workaround at https://lists.katipo.co.nz/public/koha/2018-May/050652.html (thank you) ...but there is a package dependencies problem anyway. I'm not in a hurry to upgrade Koha; then I prefer to wait for a consistent packages scenario. El 26/07/18 a les 19:47, Mirko Tietgen ha escrit:

Re: [Koha] Koha Debian packages for 18.05.02 and 17.11.08 are up

$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/koha.list deb http://debian.koha-community.org/koha stable main El 26/07/18 a les 19:46, Tomas Cohen Arazi ha escrit: > Narcis, do you have both 17.11 and 18.05 repositories configured? > > El jue., 26 jul. 2018 a las 14:27, Narcis Garcia (

Re: [Koha] Koha Debian packages for 18.05.02 and 17.11.08 are up

Please check the bug tracker at https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20826#c12 about this issue. Narcis Garcia schrieb am 26.07.2018 > This v18.05.02 seems bad packaged same as v18.05.01 > > $ apt update > $ apt-cache show koha-common | grep -ie version > Version: 18.05.02-1

Re: [Koha] Koha Debian packages for 18.05.02 and 17.11.08 are up

Narcis, do you have both 17.11 and 18.05 repositories configured? El jue., 26 jul. 2018 a las 14:27, Narcis Garcia () escribió: > This v18.05.02 seems bad packaged same as v18.05.01 > > $ apt update > $ apt-cache show koha-common | grep -ie version > Version: 18.05.02-1 > Version: 17.11.06-1 > >

Re: [Koha] Koha Debian packages for 18.05.02 and 17.11.08 are up

This v18.05.02 seems bad packaged same as v18.05.01 $ apt update $ apt-cache show koha-common | grep -ie version Version: 18.05.02-1 Version: 17.11.06-1 $ apt full-upgrade The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: [400 packages listed] Use 'sudo apt autoremov

[Koha] Koha Debian packages for 18.05.02 and 17.11.08 are up

Hi, it's hot, no further text, ;) Cheers, Mirko -- Mirko Tietgen mi...@abunchofthings.net http://koha.abunchofthings.net ___ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha

Re: [Koha] [EXTERNAL] NCIP User Question - biblionum in 001 vs 999c

Hi, Kelly-- Our records in Koha actually have different values in the 001 field based on the age of the record. When I first thought about this, I pretty much clutched my pearls and took to my fainting couch, thinking things like, "But the 001 should be our consistent, primary database key! Oh m

Re: [Koha] [Koha-devel] Koha 17.11.08 release

Great, Frido! El jue., 26 jul. 2018 a las 7:38, Fridolin SOMERS (< fridolin.som...@biblibre.com>) escribió: > The Koha community is proud to announce the release of Koha 17.11.08. > > This is a maintenance release. > > The full release notes are available at > https://koha-community.org/koha-17-1

[Koha] Koha 17.11.08 release

The Koha community is proud to announce the release of Koha 17.11.08. This is a maintenance release. The full release notes are available at https://koha-community.org/koha-17-11-08-release/ Debian packages will be upgraded in a few days. Regards, -- Fridolin SOMERS BibLibre, France - soft