I've just tested this on a design and the drc-rules is read, which I
know because if I don't add "(version 1)" at the first line I get an
error message. Other than that I doesn't seem to do anything.
I tried to add "(priority 100)" to the rules, but that is refused when
reading the drc file. It's
Hi Mark,
Clearances are in mm, so your clearances are *really* big. At a guess I’d say
all the clearances are overflow when we multiply them by mm-to-nm, but I’d
think that would give random results not no results.
You shouldn’t need to set a priority unless you’re authoring a “relaxed”
const
Hello Jeff,
Seems easy to reproduce, so here is a test project. There are just two
netclasses and three nets. I expected the cutout in the zone to create
a 1.3mm clearance for Net-(R1-Pad2).
regards,
Mark.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kic
Sorry, forgot to attach the project.
<>
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Hello KiCad team,
I am new to kicad and was thinking about helping with the MacOS CI.
Ian McInerney was mentioning on https://gitlab.com/kicad/code/kicad/-/merge_requests/218
that "currently there are no reliable macOS CI solutions for KiCad".
We don't currently have a reliable macOS CI solut
Hi Stefan
Do you have a macos yourself? If yes, you are probably better off
starting with resolving issues at
https://gitlab.com/kicad/packaging/kicad-mac-builder/-/issues
Adam Wolf got some new hardware for building for macos, the plan is to
add it as a gitlab runner. This has not been done yet.
Yeah, hence there are probably no one here that can give you
maintainer ship, unfortunately. :/
On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 16:10, Johannes Maibaum wrote:
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> Am Samstag, den 16.05.2020, 15:50 +0200 schrieb Nick Østergaard:
>
> I am not aware of who the maintainer of the flatpak is, nor d
Congrats on the first bug!
Actually 4 separate ones: the caching mechanism was causing the rules to not be
loaded when the board was read, the zone cutout stuff wasn’t fully hooked up to
the new rules engine, there’s no "Net-(C1-Pad2)" netclass in the document (only
"Net-(C1-Pad1)”), and the co
Excellent, now it works :-)
I'll test the big board tomorrow. For me this was the most important
feature missing from kicad, thanks for making it work.
regards,
Mark.
Jeff Young wrote:
Congrats on the first bug!
Actually 4 separate ones: the caching mechanism was caus
90% chance AppVeyor won't work because its build time restricted to 60
minutes. And KiCad builds quite slowly on the free services taht only
provide 1 or 2 cores.
An alternative, there's also the Azure Pipelines KiCad account where I run
Coverity. It has unlimited minutes for open source project
I provide the release builder and nightlies builder for macOS for
KiCad. I would love to have the macOS build cluster also provide CI
checks for branches and builds!
A few months ago, the second machine in the cluster broke. The first
machine is able to keep up with nightlies, but cannot do any
Am Montag, den 18.05.2020, 19:35 +0200 schrieb Nick Østergaard:
> Yeah, hence there are probably no one here that can give you
> maintainer ship, unfortunately. :/
My original intent for asking here was not asking someone on this list
to give me maintainer rights, but rather if somebody from the c
Wow, that was quick. I got added as a collaborator.
And I have just merged the update to v5.1.6 on flathub. This should hit
flatpak users as soon as some build machine does the job. It will still
lack all of the open issues, like no Python scripting support, no docs,
among a few other things), but
Hi Johannes,
Thank you for offering to take on maintenance of the flathub package.
We are happy to have your help with this, and as far as I know none of
the other lead developers was planning on taking it on.
Please feel free to reach out here if you run into any challenges with
fixing the packa
Awesome! Welcome on board, Johannes.
> On 18 May 2020, at 21:42, Jon Evans wrote:
>
> Hi Johannes,
>
> Thank you for offering to take on maintenance of the flathub package.
> We are happy to have your help with this, and as far as I know none of
> the other lead developers was planning on taki
15 matches
Mail list logo
