Well this gives me some hope. :) We'll table this issue until after the
stable release. Maybe wxFormBuilder development will start up again.
If not we will have to make a decision. Thanks everyone for the input.
Cheers,
Wayne
On 8/17/2015 5:02 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> Here, have another vot
02
To: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] wxFormBuilder and the future
Here, have another vote of confidence. Very few GUI builders aren't
crap, and most are fairly inflexible. wx is not a difficult toolkit to
work with in general and any developer who can write decent code sho
In response to a message written on 18.08.2015, 09:07, from John Devereux:
Other projects such as QUCS already use Qt.
wx is closer to gtk than to qt (easier to convert) and qt is for
comercial tasks non-free… Read the licence.
You read the license... :)
(Its's LGPL basically)
http://www.qt.
LordBlick writes:
> W odpowiedzi na wiadomość z dnia 17.08.2015, 22:33, od timofonic timofonic:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'm not a developer at all, but I got curious about this.
>>
>> KiCad is 500KLOC and 80% of it is about GUI, right? Would rewriting
>> dialog code
>> by hand require to change a lot of
Here, have another vote of confidence. Very few GUI builders aren't
crap, and most are fairly inflexible. wx is not a difficult toolkit to
work with in general and any developer who can write decent code should
be able to interact with it directly. Perhaps it is not a bad thing for
"can write w
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Wayne Stambaugh
wrote:
> On 8/17/2015 9:14 AM, David Novak wrote:
> >> To be honest, I've never been a big fan of dialog box layout tools.
> >> Their strength is there weakness. They promote designing quick dialog
> >> box layouts that makes reuse difficult. Tak
W odpowiedzi na wiadomość z dnia 17.08.2015, 22:33, od timofonic timofonic:
Hello.
I'm not a developer at all, but I got curious about this.
KiCad is 500KLOC and 80% of it is about GUI, right? Would rewriting dialog code
by hand require to change a lot of code too? Would it reduce LOC?
I see L
Hello.
I'm not a developer at all, but I got curious about this.
KiCad is 500KLOC and 80% of it is about GUI, right? Would rewriting dialog
code by hand require to change a lot of code too? Would it reduce LOC?
I see Libreoffice has some kind of similar issue, but the situation is even
worse. It
On 8/17/2015 9:14 AM, David Novak wrote:
>> To be honest, I've never been a big fan of dialog box layout tools.
>> Their strength is there weakness. They promote designing quick dialog
>> box layouts that makes reuse difficult. Take a look at the padding and
>> overall layout in KiCad's dialogs.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14:43AM -0400, David Novak wrote:
> >To be honest, I've never been a big fan of dialog box layout tools.
> >Their strength is there weakness. They promote designing quick dialog
> >box layouts that makes reuse difficult. Take a look at the padding and
> >overall layout
To be honest, I've never been a big fan of dialog box layout tools.
Their strength is there weakness. They promote designing quick dialog
box layouts that makes reuse difficult. Take a look at the padding and
overall layout in KiCad's dialogs. They are all over the map. I prefer
hand coding di
On 8/13/2015 2:05 PM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 13/08/2015 18:36, Eldar Khayrullin a écrit :
>> Hi all.
>> Maybe in future need to port kicad in other modern gui as qt(
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_(software) )
>
> A bit overkilled for this issue (if this is an issue).
> I am not especially
Le 13/08/2015 18:36, Eldar Khayrullin a écrit :
> Hi all.
> Maybe in future need to port kicad in other modern gui as qt(
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_(software) )
A bit overkilled for this issue (if this is an issue).
I am not especially thrilled by QT.
This is a very good tool, but it has
Hi all.
Maybe in future need to port kicad in other modern gui as qt(
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_(software) )
13.08.2015 13:00, Blair Bonnett пишет:
Hi all,
It appears wxFormBuilder is, if not dead, not far from it. The evidence:
* No stable release in 4 years, and the last beta releas
Hi,
On 13.08.2015 12:00, Blair Bonnett wrote:
> * No developer responses on the mailing list, including to a message
> three months ago [1] asking if the project was still active.
Hm, when I filed a bug asking for wxDataViewColumn support, that was
added quickly.
Simon
signature.asc
Descr
Hi all,
It appears wxFormBuilder is, if not dead, not far from it. The evidence:
* No stable release in 4 years, and the last beta release was 13 months ago.
* A grand total of 13 commits in the last 12 months (current trunk is
r2205, r2192 was made on 1 August 2014). A number of these are builds
16 matches
Mail list logo
