On 24 October 2012 15:59, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> Brian,
>
> I was going to refer a young engineering student to the page
>
> https://launchpad.net/kicad-winbuilder
>
> and ask that he try and use it to build newest KiCad.
>
> However after reading the initial page, I began to question if there i
Brian,
I was going to refer a young engineering student to the page
https://launchpad.net/kicad-winbuilder
and ask that he try and use it to build newest KiCad.
However after reading the initial page, I began to question if there is enough
instructional information in those few paragraphs for a
Hello Adam.
Can you remove dependency of kicad.deb from kicad-common.deb and make
kicad-common to be dependent from kicad instead as it done in original
ubuntu repository? Kicad can work without libraries while libraries are
unusable without kicad. I didn't use kicad libraries from kicad-commo
On 15 October 2012 18:56, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>> Would it be beneficial if I changed KicadWinbuilder to build with the new
>> nanometer units?
>
>
> After a period of no objections, I set CMakeList.txt to use nanometers as the
> default build mode.
>
> It is my understanding that this will af
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Adam Wolf
wrote:
> I spent a while today wrestling bzr. I'm testing the build locally, because
> you only get a few builds a day remotely, and I've got some bzr performance
> issues. Wrestling those found a bzr bug, and on and on the yak got shaved
> today.
Than
I spent a while today wrestling bzr. I'm testing the build locally,
because you only get a few builds a day remotely, and I've got some bzr
performance issues. Wrestling those found a bzr bug, and on and on the yak
got shaved today.
I'll see if I can get this out tomorrow.
After I get this out,
Exactly, if possible all must go, but that will generate pcbnew.so
installed to python directories, may be that's better to build as a
separate package?
That's for use from python (without all the kicad suite installed).
(import pcbnew )
There is one flag to enable "python inside pcbnew" ot
Thanks Miguel! That helps a lot. We also want to turn on all three
scripting options offered in the CMakeList in this build, right?
Adam Wolf
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo <
miguelan...@nbee.es> wrote:
> Great!!! :), please Adam let me know if you need any kind of in
Great!!! :), please Adam let me know if you need any kind of information of
help.
no big special care needed, just adds dependencies to:
1) wxPython-devel
2) Python-devel (tested with 2.6 and 2.7)
3) swig 2.x.x
2012/10/19 Adam Wolf
> I have some time today to set it up. I'll be taking a look
I have some time today to set it up. I'll be taking a look through the
readmes/list to see if there's a place where it explains how to turn it on
during the build shortly.
Adam Wolf
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Hans Henry von Tresckow wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Adam Wolf
>
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Adam Wolf
wrote:
> My thought is to create an additional PPA called
> kicad-daily-testing-with-scripting or something, which will be exactly
> the same as kicad-daily-testing, only with the scripting stuff turned
> on. Anyone on the current kicad-daily-testing PPA
It takes up to 24 hours to affect the PPA. Every day, it checks if
there were changes in the last 24 hours, and if so, builds.
Adam Wolf
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>> Would it be beneficial if I changed KicadWinbuilder to build with the new
>> nanometer units?
>
>
> Would it be beneficial if I changed KicadWinbuilder to build with the new
> nanometer units?
After a period of no objections, I set CMakeList.txt to use nanometers as the
default build mode.
It is my understanding that this will affect KicadWinbuilder and Adam's PPA as
well as anyone else w
On 11 October 2012 11:47, Lorenzo Marcantonio
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:27:10AM +0100, Brian Sidebotham wrote:
>> Would it be beneficial if I changed KicadWinbuilder to build with the
>> new nanometer units?
>
> IMHO the nano build is (mostly) production quality. There was some issue
> w
11.10.2012 18:31, Dick Hollenbeck kirjoitti:
(My only suspicion is with respect to grabbing zone borders with the mouse
pointer. I
have felt for some time that the hit testing there should use pixels to measure
acceptable
distance, not IU which are subject to variances on zoom factor.
There
On 10/11/2012 4:28 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
Let this serve as a round of applause to Brian, who acted on a suggestion from
me and made
something truly wonderfully useful for scores of people out of it.
This has become truly a competitive advantage to KiCad relative to alternatives.
Sort of l
Let this serve as a round of applause to Brian, who acted on a suggestion from
me and made
something truly wonderfully useful for scores of people out of it.
This has become truly a competitive advantage to KiCad relative to alternatives.
Sort of like the first electric starter in automobiles.
On 10/11/2012 03:14 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> My thought is to create an additional PPA called
> kicad-daily-testing-with-scripting or something, which will be exactly
> the same as kicad-daily-testing, only with the scripting stuff turned
> on. Anyone on the current kicad-daily-testing PPA will have
My thought is to create an additional PPA called
kicad-daily-testing-with-scripting or something, which will be exactly
the same as kicad-daily-testing, only with the scripting stuff turned
on. Anyone on the current kicad-daily-testing PPA will have to switch
PPAs to get the scripting-enabled pack
On 10/11/2012 03:00 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 3:39 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>> I'll set my PPA to whatever is decided. I am also considering making
>> a "scripting PPA" with the scripting support turned on--if it's still
>> something that has to be turned on.
> Scripting support is di
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 04:00:29PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Scripting support is disabled by default. I haven't had a chance to
> use it yet but it seems like there are quite a few folks out there
> who are using it. Maybe some of them will weigh in as to whether or
> not scripting is read
On 10/11/2012 3:39 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
I'll set my PPA to whatever is decided. I am also considering making
a "scripting PPA" with the scripting support turned on--if it's still
something that has to be turned on.
Scripting support is disabled by default. I haven't had a chance to use
it ye
On 10/11/2012 3:38 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
I think it's a pretty good idea. You might want to see what the Ubuntu
PPA folks are using just so we're all on the same page.
Thats a good point.
But I would guess they are using our defaults in the CMakeList.txt file for
this decision.
If it
I'll set my PPA to whatever is decided. I am also considering making
a "scripting PPA" with the scripting support turned on--if it's still
something that has to be turned on.
Adam Wolf
Wayne and Layne, LLC
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, Dick Ho
> I think it's a pretty good idea. You might want to see what the Ubuntu
> PPA folks are using just so we're all on the same page.
Thats a good point.
But I would guess they are using our defaults in the CMakeList.txt file for
this decision.
If its good enough for Windows, it should be good
On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
On 10/11/2012 05:27 AM, Brian Sidebotham wrote:
Hi Guys,
Would it be beneficial if I changed KicadWinbuilder to build with the
new nanometer units?
It should get more people testing the nanometer support and provide
some feedback. I think quite a
On 10/11/2012 05:27 AM, Brian Sidebotham wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Would it be beneficial if I changed KicadWinbuilder to build with the
> new nanometer units?
>
> It should get more people testing the nanometer support and provide
> some feedback. I think quite a few people use Winbuilder to get acces
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:27:10AM +0100, Brian Sidebotham wrote:
> Would it be beneficial if I changed KicadWinbuilder to build with the
> new nanometer units?
IMHO the nano build is (mostly) production quality. There was some issue
with module import/export but IIRC these were fixed.
Already di
Hi Guys,
Would it be beneficial if I changed KicadWinbuilder to build with the
new nanometer units?
It should get more people testing the nanometer support and provide
some feedback. I think quite a few people use Winbuilder to get access
to the latest versions, but don't change anything in the s
29 matches
Mail list logo
