Yeah, this is a really tough part of leading a project, figuring out
what is whim and what is worth adjusting course for. Anyway, I'll
finish the patch, get it checked, and then present my case.
On 06/03/18 04:01, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
This happened last stable release. Users wait to the
This happened last stable release. Users wait to the last minute and
then make a request for a new feature. If this would have been proposed
six months ago, it probably would be part of the v5 release. The
feature itself is a good idea but it will have to be deferred to some
later version. We r
I can certainly help check it. I think Wayne would have to make a call as
to whether or not it's too big a change to introduce now.
-Jon
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:59 AM, hauptmech wrote:
> While testing version 5 I realized that clearances are still not settable
> (like track width or via size)
While testing version 5 I realized that clearances are still not settable
(like track width or via size) and my life is going to be miserable if I
have to continue with my current work flow which is to change the default
netclass clearance to the desired clearance constantly as I lay down
different
4 matches
Mail list logo
