Hi Sywester,
Turtle mocks looks like a better fit than gMock/gTest since it's based
on Boost which is already a dependency. At least it looks like the
project is still maintained. I don't know how it compares feature wise
to gMock so there may some things missing but are they significant
enough
Hello, Here's a follow-up about mocks in the qa tests. I prepared example
use of Turtle library. My observations below: - integrates easily with
Boost.Test (HippoMocks didn't require any integration, gmock will be
harder, gitlab.com gitlab.com ) - looks similar in use to google mocks -
it'
I’ve used Mockito. Can’t say I remember a thing about it, though (which could
be good?).
Cheers,
Jeff.
> On 17 Jan 2021, at 14:49, Sylwester Kocjan wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 17/01/2021 09:47, Alex wrote:
> > ...GTest, Doctest and Catch2, (...) they'll all get the job done
>
> They are all te
Hello,
On 17/01/2021 09:47, Alex wrote:
> ...GTest, Doctest and Catch2, (...) they'll all get the job done
They are all testing frameworks without mocking capability. We have
already Boost.Test based tests and I find it unnecessary effort to
migrate them, and alone
they don't solve the proble
I've used GTest, Doctest and Catch2, and they'll all get the job done;
Doctest is definitely the fastest to compile, but also has the least of
features; Catch and GTest have the most features.
I wasn't aware that GMock could operate separately from GTest, but if it
can, that's pretty neat.
I beli
I would also suggest to look towards gtest/gmock.
It's widely adopted, works with cmake out of the box, has integrations with
popular IDEs and a good choice of supporting tools like parallelized
runners, GUI inspectors etc.
You can also use gmock separately from gtest.
Andrew
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021
Hi Sylwester-
I haven't used HippoMocks but in general, adding QA tests is always welcome
as long as they run as expected under the Fedora docker we use for online
QA with GitLab.
The downside of HippoMocks from what I can gather is that the project
appears abandoned. If I'm incorrect here, can
Hello, I have two questions regarding QA code for KiCad and I'd like to
ask for your comments about them: 1. I reviewed contents of qa directory in
KiCad repo and I saw some issues that can be fixed. Could you please take a
look at the summary and let me know if they are valid: docs.go
8 matches
Mail list logo
