but.. don't worry more about it :)
From: Kicad-developers
on behalf of
Mário Luzeiro
Sent: 07 September 2020 12:23
To: Jeff Young
Cc: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] Pad SHAPE, SH_RECT vs SH_SIMPLE
some
eth Hillbrand; kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] Pad SHAPE, SH_RECT vs SH_SIMPLE
Check the value of m_orient. It sounds like it’s not exactly 0. (Or 900, 1800
or 2700.)
> On 7 Sep 2020, at 08:41, Mário Luzeiro wrote:
>
> Here are the debug of some case
: Mário Luzeiro
> Cc: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] Pad SHAPE, SH_RECT vs SH_SIMPLE
>
> That might happen if the shape cache is dirty. You can call 'pad->IsDirty()'
> to check.
>
> One related question: if you get the SH
Hillbrand
Sent: 07 September 2020 00:33
To: Mário Luzeiro
Cc: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] Pad SHAPE, SH_RECT vs SH_SIMPLE
That might happen if the shape cache is dirty. You can call 'pad->IsDirty()'
to check.
One related question: if you get the
That might happen if the shape cache is dirty. You can call
'pad->IsDirty()' to check.
One related question: if you get the SH_SIMPLE and check the coordinates,
do they form a rectangle with angle 0?
-Seth
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 3:52 PM Mário Luzeiro wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that (if I
Hi all,
I noticed that (if I looked correctly) that there are some Pads, that are
marked as Rectangles but its shape Type is set to be SH_SIMPLE (both angles are
0)
So I got some rectangles that are SH_RECT and other rectangles are SH_SIMPLE
Could some one clarify this differences and what orig
6 matches
Mail list logo
