2015-11-16 2:46 GMT+01:00 Adam Wolf :
> The OS X RC2 build, with a much shorter, prettier filename that is mirrored
> in the version string, is building on my autobuilder. Assuming it builds,
> it'll autoupload and be moved into the stable directory.
>
> We should make sure the nightlies cleaner-o
The OS X RC2 build, with a much shorter, prettier filename that is mirrored
in the version string, is building on my autobuilder. Assuming it builds,
it'll autoupload and be moved into the stable directory.
We should make sure the nightlies cleaner-outer cronjob won't remove them.
Thanks folks,
That will actually probably be fine. I had previously discussed something
like this for the nightly builds, but RC and stable builds will be only
triggered by hand.
Adam Wolf
On Nov 13, 2015 3:30 PM, "Wayne Stambaugh" wrote:
> If you are using shell scripts, something simple like:
>
> pkgrel=1
If you are using shell scripts, something simple like:
pkgrel=1
pkgver=${kicad_version}-${pkgrel}
and manually increment pkgrel when rebuilding rc2. This is what most of
the Linux package managers do.
On 11/13/2015 4:24 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> I probably need to spend an hour and figure out how
Adam,
I'll leave this up to you. I would do what ever is the least painful.
Usually package versioning is very much platform dependent. Hopefully
you wont have to build too many rc2 packages.
Wayne
On 11/13/2015 2:25 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> 1) I need some sort of "number to increment" if it isn
I used your nightly for my test. There were several files with 11/12
date - extras and the regular nightly. I downloaded the latest in both
categories and installed them both.
I'm pretty sure that I was using the latest code.
Bob G
On 11/13/2015 11:53 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
Hi Bob!
There are no
Well, I have to make one now :)
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> How many packaging related changes do you expect to make to each release
> package?
> Den 13/11/2015 20.25 skrev "Adam Wolf" :
>
>> 1) I need some sort of "number to increment" if it isn't the timestamp,
>>
How many packaging related changes do you expect to make to each release
package?
Den 13/11/2015 20.25 skrev "Adam Wolf" :
> 1) I need some sort of "number to increment" if it isn't the timestamp,
> otherwise there's no way to tell different artifacts when I update my
> builder scripts to be bette
1) I need some sort of "number to increment" if it isn't the timestamp,
otherwise there's no way to tell different artifacts when I update my
builder scripts to be better. Would just the date be better? If not, I'll
have to do a -1, -2, -3, and that gets gross because then I need to keep
track of
Hi Adam
When you fix the build string I will start link it. I suggest that we
put it into http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/osx/stable/ and remove the
date timestamp from the filename. I can move the file if you want.
I will repost what I wrote to the debian maintainers:
Please do as suggested by W
Hi Bob!
There are no code changes in this RC2 package from the nightlies. I made a
new autobuilder for this build, and was looking for testers to make sure
the autobuilder seems ok.
It does.
Thanks!
Adam Wolf
Cofounder and Engineer
W&L
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote:
Whoops - comments on my previous message only apply to eeschema view.
The pcbnew view (openGL) will scroll so picture is 1/10 the area of the
window, rather than stopping when whole paper is visible in the window.
Scrolling and Zooming is jumpy and slow.
Scrolling requires two finger + shift to
Wow - lots of reasonable changes to the OSX version:
Two finger + Shift - trackpad works intuitively like it should (at
least for me) - move fingers left, picture moves left, move fingers up,
picture moves up, and scroll stops when edge of paper is reached.
Two finger - trackpad zoom works m
Hmm.
Johannes, you bring up a good point. How are the other platforms handling
the version information for the upcoming 4.0 release?
Adam Wolf
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Adam Wolf
wrote:
> Nick,
>
> Looks like we can put this on the website then!
>
> Let me know if you want me to handle
Nick,
Looks like we can put this on the website then!
Let me know if you want me to handle that.
Adam Wolf
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Bernhard Stegmaier <
stegma...@sw-systems.de> wrote:
>
> > [1] Apart from opening a empty, grey „Pcbnew“ when clicking on the
> Module Editor button from
> [1] Apart from opening a empty, grey „Pcbnew“ when clicking on the Module
> Editor button from the Project Manager behind the Module Editor window (which
> for itself works). But I think this is a known issue (at least I remember
> seeing this before in my own builds and your nightlies… Do we
> Am 13.11.2015 um 17:01 schrieb Adam Wolf :
>
> Both should work. It was me tweaking things that shouldn't impact the build,
> things like Jenkins retries and timeouts and stuff like that.
OK.
The build looks fine, I just opened all applications from the Project Manager
(with my last projec
Both should work. It was me tweaking things that shouldn't impact the
build, things like Jenkins retries and timeouts and stuff like that.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Johannes Maibaum
wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> > Am 13.11.2015 um 15:32 schrieb Adam Wolf >:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I uploaded
Hi Adam,
> Am 13.11.2015 um 15:32 schrieb Adam Wolf :
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I uploaded test packages of kicad and kicad-extras from the RC2 branch to the
> regular nightlies area. If someone else could download them and make sure
> they seem OK before publicizing this, that would be appreciated.
Hi folks,
I uploaded test packages of kicad and kicad-extras from the RC2 branch to
the regular nightlies area. If someone else could download them and make
sure they seem OK before publicizing this, that would be appreciated.
http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/osx/
Thanks!
Adam Wolf
Cofounder and
20 matches
Mail list logo
