Thanks for the tip.
I'll use it to check schematics wiring.
Diego
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 6:53 PM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 26/11/2017 à 19:15, Diego Herranz a écrit :
> > It's interesting that only happen if I rescue symbols.
> >
> > Anyway, thanks for the help and I'll keep an eye on properly w
Le 26/11/2017 à 19:15, Diego Herranz a écrit :
> It's interesting that only happen if I rescue symbols.
>
> Anyway, thanks for the help and I'll keep an eye on properly wired schematics
> to see if all goes OK.
>
> Thanks,
> Diego
To seen if your wires are OK, try to create a netlist:
The firs
It's interesting that only happen if I rescue symbols.
Anyway, thanks for the help and I'll keep an eye on properly wired
schematics to see if all goes OK.
Thanks,
Diego
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 5:23 PM, José Ignacio wrote:
> This might be related to the wire optimizer/junction management code.
This might be related to the wire optimizer/junction management code.
Eeschema used to allow degenerate connections like that, where an L was
superimposed to a wire, connecting into a junction.
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Diego Herranz <
diegoherr...@diegoherranz.com> wrote:
> Please ignore
Please ignore the previous attachments. They should have been these.
Thanks.
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Diego Herranz <
diegoherr...@diegoherranz.com> wrote:
> Hi, Nick
>
> Changes like: (- is removed, + added)
>
> -Wire Wire Line
> - 12550 700 12600 700
>
> -Wire Wire Line
> - 12700 700
Hi, Nick
Changes like: (- is removed, + added)
-Wire Wire Line
- 12550 700 12600 700
-Wire Wire Line
- 12700 700 12700 700
Wire Wire Line
- 22250 14500 22250 11600
+ 22250 9200 22250 14600
- Wire Wire Line
- 22250 9200 22250 14600
- Wire Wire Line
- 22700 750 15350 750
Wire Wire Line
-
On 26/11/17 04:00, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
On 11/24/2017 05:01 PM, hauptmech wrote:
On 25/11/17 02:14, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
This is *the* fatal flaw with the cache library. User's assume it is
stale symbols or a temporary copy. It is not. It is a snapshot of the
current library symbols link
What modifications are made to the wires?
2017-11-25 21:28 GMT+01:00 Diego Herranz :
> Hi,
>
> Related to this, I'm migrating an old design (~2 month old nightly) to the
> current master. First I faced some problem with '/' characters (
> https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg31705.html
Hi,
Related to this, I'm migrating an old design (~2 month old nightly) to the
current master. First I faced some problem with '/' characters (
https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg31705.html) but there have
been some improvements since then so I'm trying again.
When opening the schema
On 11/24/2017 05:01 PM, hauptmech wrote:
> On 25/11/17 02:14, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> This is *the* fatal flaw with the cache library. User's assume it is
>> stale symbols or a temporary copy. It is not. It is a snapshot of the
>> current library symbols linked to the symbols in the schematic.
On 25/11/17 02:14, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
This is *the* fatal flaw with the cache library. User's assume it is
stale symbols or a temporary copy. It is not. It is a snapshot of the
current library symbols linked to the symbols in the schematic. It gets
refreshed every time the schematic is sa
On 25/11/17 03:26, Rene Pöschl wrote:
On 24/11/17 12:38, hauptmech wrote:
On 24 Nov 2017 10:52 pm, "Rene Pöschl" wrote:
On 24/11/17 04:47, hauptmech wrote:
I can confirm unconnected wires. It may be worth noting that I did not
preserve the -cache.lib file when I archived the design.
I also
On 24/11/17 12:38, hauptmech wrote:
On 24 Nov 2017 10:52 pm, "Rene Pöschl" wrote:
On 24/11/17 04:47, hauptmech wrote:
I can confirm unconnected wires. It may be worth noting that I did not
preserve the -cache.lib file when I archived the design.
I also had an issue with an old asymmetric dio
This is *the* fatal flaw with the cache library. User's assume it is
stale symbols or a temporary copy. It is not. It is a snapshot of the
current library symbols linked to the symbols in the schematic. It gets
refreshed every time the schematic is saved. Once you delete this file
or keep an o
But still, you are required to save the cache file if you want portability.
The decision to use the word cache was probably not so good, because it
makes people think they should not back it up. But this is how it works, so
pull it out of your ignorefile.
Lets be pleased that the new schematic for
One the one hand, yes, if there is a cache file you can take advantage of
the fact that it is a stale copy of the old parts.
On the other hand, since caches are, by definition, temporary copies of
data, they don't get versioned or archived in my projects. (The kicad
libraries, and binaries, were t
On 24 Nov 2017 10:52 pm, "Rene Pöschl" wrote:
On 24/11/17 04:47, hauptmech wrote:
> I can confirm unconnected wires. It may be worth noting that I did not
> preserve the -cache.lib file when I archived the design.
>
> I also had an issue with an old asymmetric diode footprint having its
> anode
On 24/11/17 04:47, hauptmech wrote:
I can confirm unconnected wires. It may be worth noting that I did not
preserve the -cache.lib file when I archived the design.
I also had an issue with an old asymmetric diode footprint having its
anode and cathode reversed when I used it in a new design. If
This would haven been resolved if you kept the cache lib, IIRC.
Den 24. nov. 2017 4.48 AM skrev "hauptmech" :
> I can confirm unconnected wires. It may be worth noting that I did not
> preserve the -cache.lib file when I archived the design.
>
> I also had an issue with an old asymmetric diode fo
I can confirm unconnected wires. It may be worth noting that I did not
preserve the -cache.lib file when I archived the design.
I also had an issue with an old asymmetric diode footprint having its
anode and cathode reversed when I used it in a new design. If pin
numbers in the library got swa
I stand corrected. I just looked and pin numbers are checked by
position so swapped pins should get rescued. What isn't rescued is pins
that changed length which is a bit surprising since that would possibly
leave unconnected wires. I'm not sure why it was done this way but I
guess I'll have to
Maybe I am mistaken then.
2017-11-23 13:21 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh :
> On 11/22/2017 11:02 PM, hauptmech wrote:
> > When opening an old design I noticed that the C and R symbol pin nodes
> > changed position (I'm guessing other symbols as well), breaking the
> > schematic. Did the people who ch
On 11/22/2017 11:02 PM, hauptmech wrote:
> When opening an old design I noticed that the C and R symbol pin nodes
> changed position (I'm guessing other symbols as well), breaking the
> schematic. Did the people who changed these symbols have a plan for
> migrating old designs? Is the 'rescue' supp
The cache library and the rescue dialog should take care of this.
2017-11-23 5:02 GMT+01:00 hauptmech :
> When opening an old design I noticed that the C and R symbol pin nodes
> changed position (I'm guessing other symbols as well), breaking the
> schematic. Did the people who changed these symb
When opening an old design I noticed that the C and R symbol pin nodes
changed position (I'm guessing other symbols as well), breaking the
schematic. Did the people who changed these symbols have a plan for
migrating old designs? Is the 'rescue' supposed to handle this?
___
25 matches
Mail list logo
