Well, I've said it before, and I'll say it again, but I'm here to test
if anyone comes up with anything! :-)
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Jerry Jacobs
wrote:
> On 7/20/11 1:37 PM, Fred Cooke wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I tried it, but the performance was still abysmal. I find it
>> unusable. Scrolling a
On 7/20/11 1:37 PM, Fred Cooke wrote:
Hi, I tried it, but the performance was still abysmal. I find it
unusable. Scrolling and zooming are one frame per second and it really
disrupts anything that you are trying to do.
The native performance on Mac OS X compared to Windows and Linux is a
very
Hi, I tried it, but the performance was still abysmal. I find it unusable.
Scrolling and zooming are one frame per second and it really disrupts
anything that you are trying to do.
A friend of mine, who is a Mac lover, created this for testing, it's made
with "winebottler" and works acceptably. I
Try this one http://www.mdx4.org/uploads/kicad/Kicad-20-MAY-2011.zip
This uses an hacked version of wx-widgets to enable the Native wxOverlay,
the result is a working Kicad with some small issues but i think still
usable.
This was possible after the fix of some problems with the UserScale (
http:
OK, back from the shops!
kicad_osx_v3009_STABLE
It was some daily build, I think. I'm sure you know where from.
I suspected that it was a wx issue. Can you give me a link to pester
the wx devs? I will happily be their tester too :-)
I have a project of my own and a bunch of people, at least two
Marco, I'll get back to you in an hour or two about that! I promise! :-)
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Marco Serantoni
wrote:
>
> On 15/lug/2011, at 15.39, Fred Cooke wrote:
> Fred,
> About which version you are referring to, picked from where ?
> And which test you have done ?
>
> Cause is Kn
Jerry, I'm keen to test if people are making worthwhile changes to
impact the performance issues! If you know of any version that needs
some runtime on OS X, email me, or reply to this, and I'll do what I'm
told! Thanks! OK, next message :-)
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Jerry Jacobs
wrote:
>
On 15/lug/2011, at 15.39, Fred Cooke wrote:
Fred,
About which version you are referring to, picked from where ?
And which test you have done ?
Cause is Know,
wx-widgets related vs XOR (un)support on OSX, workarounded with wxOverlay that
is not correctly implemented under wxCoccoa too.
ask to wx
Hello Fred,
There are not so many people (yet) which run KiCad on Mac OS X, I build
it regular and also with latest development version of wxWidgets. The
underlaying graphics layer is not the most efficient/fastest in kicad.
The scrolling/zooming with the touchpad on the macbook zooms and scr
Hello All,
A few weeks ago I tried KiCad on OS X and although eeschema appeared
to work OK, pcbnew was unusably slow (0.3fps scrolling or zooming in
2d, 3d, which I just, tried is acceptable). I assume that you're
already aware of this, and as such I have the following questions:
Is the cause kno
10 matches
Mail list logo
