As a FYI,
Coverity has generated defects related to the new features that seem
like they can generate unexpected behavior from what I see:
#106428 (variable not initialized, considered high impact)
#106367 (null dereference)
#106366 (logically dead code)
there's a bunch of other defects but mostl
Hi,
On 06.03.2015 02:53, Mark Roszko wrote:
> /home/mroszko/kicad/include/math/vector2d.h:412:54: warning:
> ‘*((void*)(& m)+4).VECTOR2::y’ may be used uninitialized in this
> function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> return VECTOR2 ( x - aVector.x, y - aVector.y );
That is an interesting warning
FYI, while compiling 5481 for a coverity scan
In file included from /home/mroszko/kicad/include/geometry/shape.h:28:0,
from /home/mroszko/kicad/pcbnew/router/pns_diff_pair.cpp:27:
/home/mroszko/kicad/include/math/vector2d.h: In member function ‘void
PNS_DP_GATEWAYS::BuildGeneric(
On 05.03.2015 10:20, LordBlick wrote:
> In response to a message written on 03.03.2015, 20:22, from Tomasz
> Wlostowski:
>> The pads of the top/bottom connector on your PCB don't have the same X
>> coordinates (for the top connector X = 148,5011 mm, for the bottom
>> connector X = 148,5 mm).
>
> I
On 3 March 2015 at 13:44, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We've just merged the new features of the Interactive Router to the
> product branch:
> - Routing differential pairs (in push&shove mode too).
> - Tuning trace length.
> - Tuning differential pair length and skew.
>
> There's a vid
In response to a message written on 03.03.2015, 20:22, from Tomasz Wlostowski:
The pads of the top/bottom connector on your PCB don't have the same X
coordinates (for the top connector X = 148,5011 mm, for the bottom
connector X = 148,5 mm).
In my opinion (if I understand idea) in some particul
A-ma-zing work! ;)
Thank you.
Miguel Ángel Ajo
On Wednesday, 4 de March de 2015 at 3:38, Andrew Zonenberg wrote:
> So if I understand this correctly, net names must currently be FOO+ and
> FOO- for differential pair routing.
>
> Can you add support for FOO_P and FOO_N naming? These names
2015-03-04 5:20 GMT+01:00 Jon Neal :
> In the video Tom mentions that _N and _P work as well.
>
> This is an awesome addition! Now if only this had existed last summer I
> could have saved a lot of time. :)
Now you can redo your board, and get a feel for how much time you cold
have saved... :)
>
In the video Tom mentions that _N and _P work as well.
This is an awesome addition! Now if only this had existed last summer I
could have saved a lot of time. :)
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Blair Bonnett
wrote:
> On 4 March 2015 at 15:38, Andrew Zonenberg
> wrote:
> >
> > So if I understa
On 4 March 2015 at 15:38, Andrew Zonenberg
wrote:
>
> So if I understand this correctly, net names must currently be FOO+ and
FOO- for differential pair routing.
>
> Can you add support for FOO_P and FOO_N naming?
_P and _N works for me in r5472.
___
Ma
So if I understand this correctly, net names must currently be FOO+ and
FOO- for differential pair routing.
Can you add support for FOO_P and FOO_N naming? These names are legal
identifiers in most hardware description languages and will allow PCB
and HDL net names to be the same.
On 03/03/2
2015-03-03 20:22 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Wlostowski :
> On 03.03.2015 18:53, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>> 2015-03-03 18:46 GMT+01:00 Nick Østergaard :
>>> 2015-03-03 18:28 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Wlostowski :
On 03.03.2015 18:12, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> I think I found a bug.
>
> I made a test pro
On 03.03.2015 18:53, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> 2015-03-03 18:46 GMT+01:00 Nick Østergaard :
>> 2015-03-03 18:28 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Wlostowski :
>>> On 03.03.2015 18:12, Nick Østergaard wrote:
I think I found a bug.
I made a test project with two connectors, named the nets like a+ and
>>
2015-03-03 18:46 GMT+01:00 Nick Østergaard :
> 2015-03-03 18:28 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Wlostowski :
>> On 03.03.2015 18:12, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>>> I think I found a bug.
>>>
>>> I made a test project with two connectors, named the nets like a+ and
>>> a-. Then I use the Route menu -> Differential Pa
I think I found a bug.
I made a test project with two connectors, named the nets like a+ and
a-. Then I use the Route menu -> Differential Pair, start at one of
my pairs, that is directly south of the original pads... I expected it
to connect, but it does not. I needed to make a "kink" or cornor
2015-03-03 18:28 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Wlostowski :
> On 03.03.2015 18:12, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>> I think I found a bug.
>>
>> I made a test project with two connectors, named the nets like a+ and
>> a-. Then I use the Route menu -> Differential Pair, start at one of
>> my pairs, that is directly so
On 03.03.2015 18:12, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> I think I found a bug.
>
> I made a test project with two connectors, named the nets like a+ and
> a-. Then I use the Route menu -> Differential Pair, start at one of
> my pairs, that is directly south of the original pads... I expected it
> to connec
Looks very nice, I look forward to trying it out when I get home.
I will use the possibility to mention that, ... if you fell like
writing docs, don't forget what you wrote in [2] and merge it with the
effort in [3] when updated.
[2]
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kicad-product-committers/kicad/p
Great work Tom and Orson and many thanks to CERN for making this possible.
Please test the new diff pair router as much as possible so we can get
any issues sorted out as we push towards a stable release.
I know this merge fixed some outstanding issues in the OpenGL mode so
please tag any bugs th
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski
wrote:
> Many thanks to all developers, funders & users for your help and support!
Thanks in particular to you, Tom, great job! And to the Raspberry Pi
Foundation for an important donation which has greatly helped in this
development.
Cheers,
Ja
Dear all,
We've just merged the new features of the Interactive Router to the
product branch:
- Routing differential pairs (in push&shove mode too).
- Tuning trace length.
- Tuning differential pair length and skew.
There's a video tutorial and a demo available on YouTube [1].
The merge also inc
21 matches
Mail list logo
