Hi Ian,
On 05/05/2019 15:58, Ian McInerney wrote:
I saw that on the todo list along with the
auto_ptr replacement and decided to take a stab at it.
Thank you for taking the initiative here, and thanks also for updating
the TODO list!
doing the auto_ptr replacement part since when I looked t
Am 2019-05-05 18:18, schrieb Wayne Stambaugh:
Seth,
On 5/3/19 8:20 PM, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
This looks good Ian. I had been meaning to get around to this but you
beat me to it! Nice work. Thank you for your contribution!
I don't think we need to push this to 5.1 but it's nice to have in
m
Seth,
On 5/3/19 8:20 PM, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
> Am 2019-05-03 14:04, schrieb Ian McInerney:
>> This patch series removes the last uses of MUTEX and MUTLOCK from the
>> code base, so now everything is using std::mutex and std::lock_guard
>> instead of the Boost provided classes. I have also remove
Seth,
Thanks for pushing it. I saw that on the todo list along with the auto_ptr
replacement and decided to take a stab at it. I didn't end up doing the
auto_ptr replacement part since when I looked through the code it seems
they are only used in the sch_lib_table files, which I believe would be
p
Am 2019-05-03 14:04, schrieb Ian McInerney:
This patch series removes the last uses of MUTEX and MUTLOCK from the
code base, so now everything is using std::mutex and std::lock_guard
instead of the Boost provided classes. I have also removed the
ki_mutex.h header file since this is no longer need
This patch series removes the last uses of MUTEX and MUTLOCK from the code
base, so now everything is using std::mutex and std::lock_guard instead of
the Boost provided classes. I have also removed the ki_mutex.h header file
since this is no longer needed (and found an extraneous inclusion in the
p
6 matches
Mail list logo
