Re: [Kicad-developers] Pad SHAPE, SH_RECT vs SH_SIMPLE

2020-09-07 Thread Mário Luzeiro
but.. don't worry more about it :) From: Kicad-developers on behalf of Mário Luzeiro Sent: 07 September 2020 12:23 To: Jeff Young Cc: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] Pad SHAPE, SH_RECT vs SH_SIMPLE some are 0 (other

Re: [Kicad-developers] Pad SHAPE, SH_RECT vs SH_SIMPLE

2020-09-07 Thread Mário Luzeiro
some are 0 (others 90 270 180 ) (using function aPad->GetOrientationDegrees() ) 0,00 (4363, 13034000) (4453, 13034000) (4453, 12134000) (4363, 12134000) From: Jeff Young Sent: 07 September 2020 09:49 To: Mário Luzeiro Cc: Seth Hillbra

Re: [Kicad-developers] Pad SHAPE, SH_RECT vs SH_SIMPLE

2020-09-07 Thread Jeff Young
Check the value of m_orient. It sounds like it’s not exactly 0. (Or 900, 1800 or 2700.) > On 7 Sep 2020, at 08:41, Mário Luzeiro wrote: > > Here are the debug of some cases that has 4 points SH_SIMPLE > (51849001, 1150) (51849000, 1239) (52798999, 1240) (52799000, > 1151) > I

Re: [Kicad-developers] Pad SHAPE, SH_RECT vs SH_SIMPLE

2020-09-07 Thread Mário Luzeiro
Here are the debug of some cases that has 4 points SH_SIMPLE (51849001, 1150) (51849000, 1239) (52798999, 1240) (52799000, 1151) It looks the points are differ 1 unit These looks to be some strange 1 unit pad: (51849001, 1300) (51849000, 1389) (52798999, 1390) (5279900