Am 2019-05-06 21:02, schrieb Tomasz Wlostowski:
On 06/05/2019 09:48, Jeff Young wrote:
1) I hate the coroutines. They truncate backtraces in the debugger.
Hi,
How about using ucontext.h on Unices (Linux/OSX) and WinFiber API on
Windows? I have working implementation of the latter already in
Hi,
On 07.05.19 03:02, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
> How about using ucontext.h on Unices (Linux/OSX) and WinFiber API on
> Windows? I have working implementation of the latter already in the MSVC
> branch. Are there any reasons to not use ucontext under Linux/OSX?
Technically, these APIs are depre
On 06/05/2019 09:48, Jeff Young wrote:
> 1) I hate the coroutines. They truncate backtraces in the debugger.
Hi,
How about using ucontext.h on Unices (Linux/OSX) and WinFiber API on
Windows? I have working implementation of the latter already in the MSVC
branch. Are there any reasons to not use
Hi Reece,
I only have opinions on a few of your questions so far:
1. This seems logical to me
2. I agree this panel is getting full. Maybe we should start a
"coordinates and grids" setting page, if we are eventually going to support
custom grids, move the current grid settings there, and add you
On 06/05/2019 22:12, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
On 5/6/2019 5:11 PM, John Beard wrote:
I still suggest to change it to false be default and allow developers to
manually align when they want (and then override the formatter). Then at
least the default behaviour is a valid formatting choice.
That wo
Looks good John, feel free to push the change.
Thanks,
Wayne
On 5/6/2019 5:35 PM, John Beard wrote:
> On 06/05/2019 22:12, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> On 5/6/2019 5:11 PM, John Beard wrote:
>>> I still suggest to change it to false be default and allow developers to
>>> manually align when they wa
John,
On 5/6/2019 5:11 PM, John Beard wrote:
>
>
> On 06/05/2019 21:46, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> John,
>>
>> On 5/6/19 4:09 PM, John Beard wrote:
>>> On 06/05/2019 17:51, Reece R. Pollack wrote:
John,
I've already jumped to clang-format 6.0, which is one of the optional
inst
On 06/05/2019 21:46, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
John,
On 5/6/19 4:09 PM, John Beard wrote:
On 06/05/2019 17:51, Reece R. Pollack wrote:
John,
I've already jumped to clang-format 6.0, which is one of the optional
installs for Mint 18. That works, once you get all the symlinks fixed,
Good to kn
We do use (and encourage) single-line cases when it’s more readable that way.
This particularly comes up when mapping or converting something, such as:
switch( aFaceId )
{
case FACE_SCH: name = KIFACE_PREFIX "eeschema";break;
case FACE_PCB: name = KIFACE_PREF
John,
On 5/6/19 4:09 PM, John Beard wrote:
> On 06/05/2019 17:51, Reece R. Pollack wrote:
>> John,
>>
>> I've already jumped to clang-format 6.0, which is one of the optional
>> installs for Mint 18. That works, once you get all the symlinks fixed,
>
> Good to know, thanks for the update.
>
>>
On 06/05/2019 17:51, Reece R. Pollack wrote:
John,
I've already jumped to clang-format 6.0, which is one of the optional
installs for Mint 18. That works, once you get all the symlinks fixed,
Good to know, thanks for the update.
except it keeps wanting to reformat my switch statements like
That would be very cool, because a lot of the rest of the framework is really
nice.
> On 6 May 2019, at 18:22, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
>
> On 06/05/2019 09:48, Jeff Young wrote:
>> 1) I hate the coroutines. They truncate backtraces in the debugger.
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I'm thinking how to impro
Sorry for the noise.
It appears that we need to adjust that script for when new versions of
swig come out. Homebrew recently updated to swig 4.0.0. I will see
if I can version pin swig for the moment and come up with the patch to
get swig 4.0.0 working.
Adam
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:25 PM Ada
If you are just doing the footprint checks then using the pcbnew python
support should be fine. Whether or not it gets accepted into kicad
depends on you commitment to maintaining it but you can always load and
run it as a third party script. You will have to live with some api
breakage from time
On 06/05/2019 09:48, Jeff Young wrote:
> 1) I hate the coroutines. They truncate backtraces in the debugger.
Hi Jeff,
I'm thinking how to improve this. Perhaps we can 'fix' a fake stack
frame that will allow the debugger to unwind the stack past the
coroutine entry point...
Tom
___
Hi folks!
I'm still not able to get anything to build on macOS, either 10.14 or
10.11. I keep getting:
Error: the swig import helper was not fixed, check
/vagrant/build/kicad/src/kicad-build/pcbnew/pcbnew.py
and fix this script: fix_swig_imports.py
Does anyone know anything more about this? Is
Jeff,
On 5/6/19 10:48 AM, Jeff Young wrote:
> 1) I hate the coroutines. They truncate backtraces in the debugger.
I'm not a big fan either but apparently they were the best solution for
the P&S router design. I don't know if that is still the case or if we
even tried a different solution at the
John,
I've already jumped to clang-format 6.0, which is one of the optional installs
for Mint 18. That works, once you get all the symlinks fixed, except it keeps
wanting to reformat my switch statements like this, which is contrary to the
KiCad coding standards:
@@ -148,15 +130,9 @@ int PCB_
Hi Dino,
No need for a bug report for this one.
Interestingly it was never implemented in the modern toolset for PCBNew either.
I’m going to enable it for both and we’ll see what falls out. ;)
Cheers,
Jeff.
> On 6 May 2019, at 16:10, Dino Ghilardi wrote:
>
> Hello everybody, I've seen a "f
Hello everybody, I've seen a "fast fix" an eemodern, so...
The "return" hotkey for "left-click" is not working for me on
2d2b5f3e1915a270f2a51eb342f761df8b8a0122 doing a "paste" function.
Reproducing it:
-Select a block
-ctrl-c for copy
-ctrl-v for paste
1) I hate the coroutines. They truncate backtraces in the debugger.
2) Having individual event loops for drawing, moving, etc. hugely improves
encapsulation.
3) The improved encapsulation does make debugging easier overall. It’s still a
pity about (1) though.
4) It can be a bit hard to remem
On 2019-05-06 8:11 a.m., John Beard wrote:
* Tell people to use 3.9 or later (actually I don't know what options we
have need what versions).
I recently found an online clang configuration tool as I'm thinking of
adding in git hooks to force a developer to follow a coding style we've
talked abo
That was quick! Thanks Jeff.
On 5/6/19 10:32 AM, Jeff Young wrote:
> Fixed. (d12eee9c9876062e0463148a57f3b33ab016205f)
>
>> On 6 May 2019, at 13:48, Jeff Young wrote:
>>
>> No need. Reproduces for me. I’m on it.
>>
>>> On 6 May 2019, at 13:47, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>>
>>> The sheet tool is
Fixed. (d12eee9c9876062e0463148a57f3b33ab016205f)
> On 6 May 2019, at 13:48, Jeff Young wrote:
>
> No need. Reproduces for me. I’m on it.
>
>> On 6 May 2019, at 13:47, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>
>> The sheet tool is broken. The first click starts drawing the sheet as
>> expected. The secon
No need. Reproduces for me. I’m on it.
> On 6 May 2019, at 13:47, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>
> The sheet tool is broken. The first click starts drawing the sheet as
> expected. The second click does not complete the sheet and show the
> sheet properties dialog and the sheet being drawn disappe
The sheet tool is broken. The first click starts drawing the sheet as
expected. The second click does not complete the sheet and show the
sheet properties dialog and the sheet being drawn disappears. I can
file a bug report if your prefer.
Wayne
On 5/5/19 4:32 PM, Michael Kavanagh wrote:
> Sou
On 5/6/19 6:38 AM, Jeff Young wrote:
> Eelik reported that our cross-probing is inconsistent. Symbols are
> highlighted while footprints are selected.
>
> Is there a reason for them being different?
>
> If not, I presume uniformly highlighting would be better than uniformly
> selecting?
I wou
I guess this is sort of related to the observation and response I got here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net/msg27587.html
Or maybe I misunderstand what exactly you mean.
On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 12:38, Jeff Young wrote:
>
> Eelik reported that our cross-probing is
On 03/05/2019 19:28, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
I'm guessing John used a later version of clang-format when he wrote the
commit hooks. John, any ideas how to fix this or do we force devs to
use clang-format > 3.8?
I'm on Arch, so I have quite recent clang-format (8.0.0). This
particular option h
It doesn’t work for anyone in last night’s build. The mouse handling got lost
in a recent merge. (It’s now fixed if you do your own build, or you can wait
for tonight’s nightly.)
Cheers,
Jeff.
> On 6 May 2019, at 12:06, Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
>
> A quick question. I can't edit symbols (the
Hi Ian,
On 05/05/2019 15:58, Ian McInerney wrote:
I saw that on the todo list along with the
auto_ptr replacement and decided to take a stab at it.
Thank you for taking the initiative here, and thanks also for updating
the TODO list!
doing the auto_ptr replacement part since when I looked t
A quick question. I can't edit symbols (the editor's tools don't work at
all, at least graphic lines and pins) with the latest nightly build on
Windows. Going back to 5.1.2 helps. Has anyone tried symbol editing with a
version with modern toolset in eeschema? Or maybe it's not related to the
modern
Eelik reported that our cross-probing is inconsistent. Symbols are highlighted
while footprints are selected.
Is there a reason for them being different?
If not, I presume uniformly highlighting would be better than uniformly
selecting?
___
Mailing l
33 matches
Mail list logo
