Hi Orson and KiCad devs,
During rebuilding current nightly I noticed this warning and decided to
look into it.
/usr/local/google/home/alutsenko/src/kicad/common/dialogs/dialog_print_generic.cpp:
In member function ‘virtual void
DIALOG_PRINT_GENERIC::onCloseButton(wxCommandEvent&)’:
/usr/local/goo
Hi Rene-
Am 2018-11-06 16:41, schrieb Rene Pöschl:
Sadly we did not come around to fix all symbols before the v5 release.
We now seem to have a volunteer who would be prepared to fix these
symbols.
There is a catch though. Whatever we do to fix this it will break
designs that use the old symbol
Only logic family libs are affected. The 4xxx lib is already done. This
leaves 4 libs at most. (I have no access to kicad right at this moment
so i can not check.)
Only option 2 ends up with multiples of the lib. In option 3 we will
rename the lib (meaning a new lib will be added and the origi
Hi, Rene.
Thanks for bringing this up. I've never liked hidden power pins. In my
opinion, the python philosophy applies here too: "Explicit is better than
implicit."
How many libraries will need this?
I'm asking because, if we went for option 3 (or 2), will we end up with a
lot of nearly identica
Hi Oliver,
I was about to bump your email too :)
> 2) The m_Preview parameter is saved to file (both .kicad_mod and .kicad_pcb)
At the time I worked on the 3D Viewer, some ideas arise that involve to add new
tags to the .kicad_pcb
I understood that at that time it was not a good time to introduc
Hi all,
Sadly we did not come around to fix all symbols before the v5 release.
We now seem to have a volunteer who would be prepared to fix these symbols.
There is a catch though. Whatever we do to fix this it will break
designs that use the old symbols right now.
So we have a few options
Bump :)
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:27 PM Oliver Walters <
oliver.henry.walt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The attached patchset expands on the "Preview" checkbox in the 3D model
> tab in the footprint editor.
>
> This "Preview" option currently only applies to the preview window.
> However if the user w
I don't think this is an issue outside of Fedora.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 8:45 AM Steven A. Falco
wrote:
> I'd like to have a discussion about python shebangs. I noticed several
> rpmlint errors when building the official Fedora packages. Specifically,
> rpmlint is complaining about using "env"
On 11/6/2018 11:15 AM, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> On 06.11.2018 15:45, Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
>> I've done a little research, and apparently, the concern is that "env" may
>> find a locally installed python interpreter that doesn't work the same as
>> the system python interpret
Hi Steven,
On 06.11.2018 15:45, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> I've done a little research, and apparently, the concern is that "env" may
> find a locally installed python interpreter that doesn't work the same as the
> system python interpreter, and that can result in subtle bugs. Of course the
>
Hi,
I've tracked it down to the following conditions:
* glm includes commit 68c7e7e50 (e.g. 0.9.9.3)
* C++11 (before is OK, C++14 is OK)
* The define GLM_FORCE_PURE is set (KiCad does this in xv3d_types.h)
I've filed a bug upstream at glm [1].
Notable line in the GLM manual: "The use of intrins
It also breaks msys2/mingw32/mingw64 builds. :(
On 11/6/2018 9:19 AM, John Beard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a quick word of caution: I can can't get KiCad to build with glm
> version 0.9.9.3, which was updated yesterday.
>
> The responsible change in glm appears to be 68c7e7e50 [1], which deals
> wit
I'd like to have a discussion about python shebangs. I noticed several rpmlint
errors when building the official Fedora packages. Specifically, rpmlint is
complaining about using "env" as a method for locating the python interpreter.
Here are the errors:
kicad-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-int
Hi,
Just a quick word of caution: I can can't get KiCad to build with glm
version 0.9.9.3, which was updated yesterday.
The responsible change in glm appears to be 68c7e7e50 [1], which deals
with constexprs in GCC. There are various errors in the 3d-viewer [2].
However, I am not sure if this is
Thank you, I can confirm that this was the last change that made the
fedora build happy. :)
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 20:33, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>
> John,
>
> I merged your patch.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wayne
>
> On 11/5/2018 9:49 AM, John Beard wrote:
> > Gah! Wrong patch! Try this.
> > On Mon, Nov 5, 20
15 matches
Mail list logo
