Hi,
I can trigger an Assertion Failure fairly reliably:
1. Open KiCad
2. Open a PCB in pcbnew
3. Close the KiCad project manager
This leads to
kicad: /home/geier/kicad/common/gal/opengl/opengl_compositor.cpp:133:
virtual void KIGFX::OPENGL_COMPOSITOR::Resize(unsigned int, unsigned
int): Zusiche
Hi,
I just fixed the MSVC build by using a better FindPixman.cmake that
doesn't make as many assumptions about the system.
There are a few new warnings that popped up:
> fp_lib_table.cpp:182, MSBuild, Priority: Normal
> 'FP_LIB_TABLE::Parse': function assumed not to throw an exception but does
---
CMakeModules/FindPixman.cmake | 162 +++---
1 file changed, 135 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/CMakeModules/FindPixman.cmake b/CMakeModules/FindPixman.cmake
index 18e0c399e..128ca8237 100644
--- a/CMakeModules/FindPixman.cmake
+++ b/CMakeModule
The newest version is 0.34. 1.0 doesn't exist, this only worked because
there is no actual version test.
---
CMakeLists.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt
index 8d71af2c6..349d69df8 100644
--- a/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/CMakeLists.t
Hi Konstantin,
I committed your patch. Thank you for making the changes Orson
suggested and the patch. In the future, please update the copyright
date when you make changes to source files.
Cheers,
Wayne
On 1/17/2017 12:17 PM, Константин Барановский wrote:
> In attachment placed new patch, th
slightly off-topic (again?) but it just came to mind.
currently if option X requires Y then Y is forced on if not already
on. is there a way to differentiate between an explicit OFF and an
implicit OFF that we could use to force on if implicit but error if
explicitly off.
This might be useful
> yes i was trying to subtly imply that :)
ok, find attached the patch with the about box updated ;)
Regards,
diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt
index 8d71af2..52de977 100644
--- a/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -63,6 +63,10 @@ option( KICAD_SCRIPTING_WXPYTHON
"Build wxPytho
In attachment placed new patch, that contains both previous patches and in
mousewheelpan mode, with pressed Shift key, does horizontal scrolling.
So, in common, we will get:
* mousewheelpan disabled:
- mousewheel = zooming;
- mousewheel + ctrl = horizontal scrolling;
- mousewheel + shift = vertic
yes i was trying to subtly imply that :)
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud
wrote:
> Did you want I add it to the patch?
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
> Le 16 janv. 2017 20:35, "Wayne Stambaugh" a écrit :
>>
>> Yes. This is a useful piece of information in case we suddenly get a
>> rash
On 1/17/2017 7:50 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
> I looked at the video and the concept is very nice, nice work!
>
> I agree with wayne that automatic netcode is a bit dangerous, I would
> recommend that you use a wxSingleChoice dialog in the beginning of
> adding a via, so that the user can choo
I looked at the video and the concept is very nice, nice work!
I agree with wayne that automatic netcode is a bit dangerous, I would
recommend that you use a wxSingleChoice dialog in the beginning of
adding a via, so that the user can choose netcode from a list. Or
something better :)
> I woul
Did you want I add it to the patch?
Regards.
Le 16 janv. 2017 20:35, "Wayne Stambaugh" a écrit :
> Yes. This is a useful piece of information in case we suddenly get a
> rash of python scripting bug reports.
>
> On 1/16/2017 2:15 PM, Simon Wells wrote:
> > Should this option be added to the
On 16.01.2017 13:41, jp charras wrote:
> I am waiting for comments, especially for custom pads.
Hi Jean Pierre,
Many thanks for your comments. I need a bit of time to answer and
rethink the proposal. I'll reply as soon as possible.
Cheers,
Tom
___
Mai
Hi Konstantin,
Your patches were not ignored, the problem was neither me nor Wayne
could fully apply the patches in their original version. Thank you for
correcting this.
I still hold my previous remark about wheel scroll and shift+wheel
scroll doing the same thing when touchpad panning is enable
14 matches
Mail list logo
