Yes, same for me… :)
Regards,
Bernhard
> On 21 Jul 2015, at 01:39, Garth Corral wrote:
>
>
> Since nobody has replied, I'll say that I'd be happy to do this but don't
> currently have a mouse with a middle button. I'll try to dig one up but in
> the mean time if some who has such a device c
This isn't a concern in legacy, which displays all layers 'flat' anyway,
but GAL brings the active layer to the front. Does anyone think that
when editing a back mechanical layer like B.SilkS, B.Cu should be
brought to front so you can see the things in the neighborhood of
B.SilkS? Or even brin
The Enter button cannot be used as OK in DialogEditModuleText while in a
text field. This patch fixes that.
--
Chris
commit f459b217a8cc55d8d80463933ecceca02aa213c6
Author: Chris Pavlina
Date: Mon Jul 20 19:45:53 2015 -0400
Fix enter button in dialog_edit_module_text
diff --git a/pcbnew/
Since nobody has replied, I'll say that I'd be happy to do this but don't
currently have a mouse with a middle button. I'll try to dig one up but in the
mean time if some who has such a device can try this out, please do. As for
the panning past the scroll bar limits, it always seemed odd to
Patch committed in product branch r5966. Thanks.
On 7/20/2015 4:26 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> On some systems, a mismatched format string in
> dialog_print_using_printer.cpp causes an assertion failure and
> subsequent segfault. (Some wx builds seem not to mind - I couldn't
> reproduce the fai
Patch committed in product branch r5965. Thanks.
On 7/20/2015 2:47 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> When running the BOM export in pcbnew on an empty board, a very obtuse
> "No Modules!" error message is displayed. This patch rewrites it to
> "Cannot export BOM: there are no footprints in the PCB".
>
On some systems, a mismatched format string in
dialog_print_using_printer.cpp causes an assertion failure and
subsequent segfault. (Some wx builds seem not to mind - I couldn't
reproduce the failure on my own system - but the bug is definitely there
and someone shared a backtrace with me.) This
In response to a message written on 20.07.2015, 19:16, from Wayne Stambaugh:
N is already used in Eeschema so we will have to change the N hot key
action in Eeschema if you want to keep it the same as Pcbnew.In my opinion the
use Shift with a fairly away from him, another key in commonly
used s
It looks promising but the dialog box may need some layout changes. I'm
not sure what, but it looks a bit odd and may be problematic on smaller
displays. I certainly will entertain the idea during the next
development cycle. At this point, I'm going to put the brakes on any
new features so we ca
When running the BOM export in pcbnew on an empty board, a very obtuse
"No Modules!" error message is displayed. This patch rewrites it to
"Cannot export BOM: there are no footprints in the PCB".
--
Chris
commit c8363cbe351d6a22921da725748e1d599084eb45
Author: Chris Pavlina
Date: Mon Jul 20
The hot key.
On 7/20/2015 1:44 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> Which thing? The 100 mil grid select or the hotkey?
>
> 2015-07-20 19:31 GMT+02:00 Wayne Stambaugh :
>> Oh yeah! We shouldn't forget the component library editor as well. I
>> didn't even look to see if this was implemented in the foot
Which thing? The 100 mil grid select or the hotkey?
2015-07-20 19:31 GMT+02:00 Wayne Stambaugh :
> Oh yeah! We shouldn't forget the component library editor as well. I
> didn't even look to see if this was implemented in the footprint editor.
>
> On 7/20/2015 1:19 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
>> Goo
Oh yeah! We shouldn't forget the component library editor as well. I
didn't even look to see if this was implemented in the footprint editor.
On 7/20/2015 1:19 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> Good point, and a tricky decision. Not having the hotkeys unified across
> the whole package steepens the le
On 7/20/2015 1:19 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> Good point, and a tricky decision. Not having the hotkeys unified across
> the whole package steepens the learning curve, but changing hotkeys can
> piss off long-time users.
I'm not sure how much the change component to normal orientation (N) hot
key
Good point, and a tricky decision. Not having the hotkeys unified across
the whole package steepens the learning curve, but changing hotkeys can
piss off long-time users.
Myself, I'd vote to unify the hotkeys - but not arbitrarily, it's
something that should probably be done all at once so we'r
N is already used in Eeschema so we will have to change the N hot key
action in Eeschema if you want to keep it the same as Pcbnew.
On 7/20/2015 1:12 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> N and Shift-N, should be - since that is what pcbnew is using
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 07:10:46PM +0200, LordBlick
N and Shift-N, should be - since that is what pcbnew is using
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 07:10:46PM +0200, LordBlick wrote:
> In response to a message written on 20.07.2015, 16:14, from Wayne Stambaugh:
> >Patch committed in product branch r5961. Thanks.
> >
> >On 7/2/2015 4:40 PM, Nick Østergaard
In response to a message written on 20.07.2015, 16:14, from Wayne Stambaugh:
Patch committed in product branch r5961. Thanks.
On 7/2/2015 4:40 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
I hereby attach a patch for the bug mentioned in the subject.
Please consider this patch and commit at will.
Suggested com
I've found bug in eeschema - unfinished functionality:
- select some elements and chose „copy block”
- after drag to new place press „R” to rotate the block copy to the desired
position
Unexpectedly application drops block copy to /dev/null and rotates source
block.
--
Best Regards,
LordBlick
Le 19/07/2015 10:54, LordBlick a écrit :
Why modal dialog from pcbnew(netlist) also blocks any operation in
eeschema?
This as to do with the new modular architecture.
We had some discussion maybe one year ago with Dick on this subject and
he did a change to correct this annoying behaviour fo
Your patch was committed in the product branch r5962. Thank you for
your contribution to KiCad.
Cheers,
Wayne
On 6/27/2015 4:23 PM, Ruben De Smet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While trying to fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1423515, I
> tripped over this simple code style error.
>
> You can look
Patch committed in product branch r5961. Thanks.
On 7/2/2015 4:40 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> I hereby attach a patch for the bug mentioned in the subject.
>
> Please consider this patch and commit at will.
>
> Suggested commit message:
> Add 100 mil grid for eeschema to help confirming to KLC
22 matches
Mail list logo
