On 1/2/2013 3:25 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> I think I was pointed that way previously, the last time I tried to fix
> this. I believe the cmake files are regenerated each time at the
> launchpad build servers--without any caching. However, the proof's in
> the pudding!
You are correct. I just looke
On 01/02/2013 12:44 PM, Vesa Solonen wrote:
> 02.01.2013 16:31, Adam Wolf kirjoitti:
>> Hi Solonen,
>>
>> There previously was a bug in my packaging that caused the wrong date to be
>> pulled in to the build version information. I had fixed it a while ago,
>> but I will see if there is a regressio
I think I was pointed that way previously, the last time I tried to fix
this. I believe the cmake files are regenerated each time at the launchpad
build servers--without any caching. However, the proof's in the pudding!
Thanks Wayne.
Adam Wolf
Wayne and Layne, LLC
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:15
On 1/2/2013 3:04 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> I'm not certain that my PPA currently works--as far as I can tell, it
> has the wrong date. I've tinkered around trying to solve this a few
> times in the past, and finally tracked it down to a missing
> build-dependency of bzr. They're installed on my loca
I'm not certain that my PPA currently works--as far as I can tell, it has
the wrong date. I've tinkered around trying to solve this a few times in
the past, and finally tracked it down to a missing build-dependency of bzr.
They're installed on my local machine, of course, but not on the remote
la
02.01.2013 16:31, Adam Wolf kirjoitti:
> Hi Solonen,
>
> There previously was a bug in my packaging that caused the wrong date to be
> pulled in to the build version information. I had fixed it a while ago,
> but I will see if there is a regression.
Thanks for a prompt response. It's great that
Hi Solonen,
There previously was a bug in my packaging that caused the wrong date to be
pulled in to the build version information. I had fixed it a while ago,
but I will see if there is a regression.
Adam Wolf
Wayne and Layne, LLC
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Solonen Vesa wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
It seems PPA version report is flawed regarding build revision
[(2012-nov-02)-testing]:
Application: Eeschema
Version: (2012-nov-02)-testing
Build: wxWidgets 2.8.12 (no debug,Unicode,compiler with C++ ABI 1002,GCC
4.6.3,wx containers,compatible with 2.6)
Platform: Linux 3.2.0-35-generic x86
El 02/01/13 11:43, jean-pierre charras escribió:
> ...
>>
>> To fix (a) I was asking about the relation between .sch files,
>> components and libraries. When I open a .sch file which uses components
>> that are not in my loaded libraries, how does eeschema know the
>> components definition?
>>
> So
Le 18/12/2012 10:14, Jacobo Aragunde Pérez a écrit :
El 15/12/12 20:28, jp charras escribió:
Le 14/12/2012 10:16, Jacobo Aragunde Pérez a écrit :
I have noticed there is a feature in Pcbnew, "Append board", to add all
the components from a .brd file into the currently opened document. This
feat
10 matches
Mail list logo
