On 12/13/24 01:54, Yan Zhao wrote:
> + /*
> + * The destination addresses are searched from system RAM rather than
> + * being allocated from the buddy allocator, so they are not guaranteed
> + * to be accepted by the current kernel. Accept the destination
> + * addresses b
On 1/13/25 06:59, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
...
> I have a new objection. I believe ``unaccepted memory'' and especially
> lazily initialized ``unaccepted memory'' is an information leak that
> could defeat the purpose of encrypted memory. For that reason I have
> Cc'd the security list. I don't
