[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-04-04 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2019-04-04 08:50 EDT--- Hi Cascardo! (In reply to comment #42) > Hi, Gustavo. > > We have just missed the kernel freeze. So, we will need to SRU this change. > I am still waiting for your feedback, before I submit this for review. I think it's fine to m

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-03-28 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2019-03-28 23:03 EDT--- (In reply to comment #38) > Can you try the kernel at ppa:cascardo/linux, and see if that works for you? Hi Cascardo. It looks good. I'm able to get a jit profile using the agent found in linux-tools-5.0.0-8-generic with: $ sudo

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-03-26 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2019-03-26 07:18 EDT--- (In reply to comment #39) > Gustavo, Could you test please Yes. Please, give me one more today. Thanks, Gustavo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-03-21 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2019-03-21 16:33 EDT--- Hi Cascardo, (In reply to comment #36) > I would like to ask if using the same location as the real perf binary > itself would be fine for your needs. > > That is, a symlink at /usr/lib/linux-tools/`uname -r`/libperf_jvmti.so > po

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-03-20 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2019-03-20 12:22 EDT--- Thanks a lot Andrew, Terry, and Cascardo. If there is anything I can help on the PPC64 side, please let me know. Best regards, Gustavo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-03-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2019-03-18 14:24 EDT--- Frankly, it's quite upsetting not hearing from Canonical after so much time. I do understand that kernel team might frown upon adding a Java stuff as a dep for building the kernel packages and that any other similar conundrum mig

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-03-14 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2019-03-15 00:38 EDT--- Any update on this bug ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1761379 Title: [18.04/18.10] File libperf-jvm

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-12-21 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2018-12-21 12:13 EDT--- Hi Frank, Thanks for the update. Looking forward for the final resolution :) Happy Holidays. Regards, Gustavo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-10-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2018-10-18 16:11 EDT--- Hi Joseph, (In reply to comment #23) > I create one more PPA at the same locate, but with v3 in the name: > https://launchpad.net/~jsalisbury/+archive/ubuntu/1761379 My understanding is that the PPA ppc64el build broke. There are

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-10-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2018-10-18 09:14 EDT--- (In reply to comment #23) > I create one more PPA at the same locate, but with v3 in the name: > https://launchpad.net/~jsalisbury/+archive/ubuntu/1761379 Thanks. I'll gitve it a try today. > Just to confirm, you have java on you

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-10-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2018-10-15 17:33 EDT--- Hi Joseph, (In reply to comment #20) > It's possible this is happening because I'm cross compiling. I'll build the > packages in a PPA, so it is a native compile. > > The PPA will be located at: > https://launchpad.net/~jsalisbur

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-10-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2018-10-11 12:40 EDT--- (In reply to comment #18) > I built a v2 test kernel. All the .debs can be downloaded from: > > http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1761379/v2 > > Can you test this kernel and see if it resolves this bug? Hi Joseph, Thanks fo

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-10-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2018-10-10 17:08 EDT--- Hi Joseph, It looks like 'perf' binary is missing in linux-tools-common in the pointed out packages: root@gromero16:~/perf/lp1761379# dpkg -c linux-tools-common_4.15.0-34.38~lp1761379_all.deb drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2018-

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-08-27 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2018-08-27 09:00 EDT--- Hi Salibury, Any update on that? Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1761379 Title: [18.04/18.10]

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-06-25 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2018-06-25 11:18 EDT--- (In reply to comment #9) > Support for artful will end soon (July 2018) therefore marking this as a > won't fix. OK. But how about 18.04? Could you please at least provide a clarification/confirmation about why that lib is not inc

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-05-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2018-05-11 11:07 EDT--- Hi Canonical, Now it's Triaged, what's your thought on that issue? Thank you. Regards, Gustavo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1761379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-05-07 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grom...@br.ibm.com 2018-05-07 07:16 EDT--- Hello, So have the kernel team confirmed that issue? Is the absent file (libperf-jvmti.so) marked to be included in any packaged already? Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Pack