[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1888639] Re: Microsoft LifeCam Cinema reports "device descriptor read/all, error -71" on 20.04 with USB-C adaptor

2020-08-12 Thread Robert Collins
That was when the USB-power/HDMI/DP adapter was plugged in the other side. The relevant log entries from lower down are: ``` [622581.193592] usb 3-8: new high-speed USB device number 71 using xhci_hcd [622581.342507] usb 3-8: device descriptor read/all, error -71 [622581.469590] usb 3-8: new high-

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1888639] [NEW] Microsoft LifeCam Cinema reports "device descriptor read/all, error -71" on 20.04 with USB-C adaptor

2020-07-23 Thread Robert Collins
Public bug reported: I have a MS LifeCam Cinema, which is known to work with Ubuntu in the past, though forum posts show it no longer working as of ~18.04. I recently went back to Ubuntu as an actual desktop OS with 20.04 on a dell xps 13, which has a somewhat average webcam in the lid, so tried

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1766857] Re: [Hyper-V] KVP daemon fails to start

2020-04-02 Thread Robert Collins
Can confirm the Azure kernel also fixes enhanced sessions when combined with appropriate windows side metadata shenanigans. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-azure in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766857 Tit

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1766857] Re: [Hyper-V] KVP daemon fails to start

2020-04-02 Thread Robert Collins
Just created a new VM and wondered why enhanced mode logins in hyper-V weren't working and encountered this. $ uname -a Linux cognite-lifeless 5.3.0-45-generic #37-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 26 20:41:27 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1810267] Re: hard lockup on multiple CPUs in spl_cache_flush

2019-01-02 Thread Robert Collins
** Description changed: - Photo of failed machine at https://photos.app.goo.gl/UGofDoh2DdDvNTMM8 + Photo of failed machine, and video of a second lockup at + https://photos.app.goo.gl/9qUxysZ4LN1NRdrA7 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: linux-image-4.15.0-43-generic 4.1

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1810276] [NEW] bcache TRIM support buggy - mkfs.ext4 error discarding blocks

2019-01-02 Thread Robert Collins
Public bug reported: Sorry that this is a little vague, I ran into it and didn't run it down to ground; this was on the cosmic daily server installer build. hardware: 4 HDD;s, 1 NVMe SSD. configuration: 1x 512MB ESP per drive, then for the HDDs the second partition for an mdraid raid5 set. la

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1809748] Re: 8k bcache NULL pointer deref on mount / can't boot

2019-01-02 Thread Robert Collins
hint if testing this - add module_blacklist=bcache to your kernel boot line to boot and reset the metadata :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1809748 Title: 8k bcache NULL

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1810267] [NEW] hard lockup on multiple CPUs in spl_cache_flush

2019-01-01 Thread Robert Collins
Public bug reported: Photo of failed machine at https://photos.app.goo.gl/UGofDoh2DdDvNTMM8 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: linux-image-4.15.0-43-generic 4.15.0-43.46 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-43.46-generic 4.15.18 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-43-generic x86_64 NonfreeKerne

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1809748] Re: 8k bcache NULL pointer deref on mount / can't boot

2018-12-25 Thread Robert Collins
after doing a wipefs on the cache drive the BUG still occured; wipefs's the backing drive corrected that. I haven't yet tried wiping just the backing drive. ** Summary changed: - 8k bcache cache NULL pointer deref on mount / can't boot + 8k bcache NULL pointer deref on mount / can't boot -- You

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1809748] Re: 8k bcache cache NULL pointer deref on mount / can't boot

2018-12-25 Thread Robert Collins
cache superblock info - sb.magicok sb.first_sector 8 [match] sb.csum 5A3217E583DB5B86 [match] sb.version 0 [cache device] dev.label (empty) dev.uuid2a9e0dfd-acd0-4750-85ae-b347d7580e2b dev.sectors_per_block 16 dev

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1809748] [NEW] 8k bcache cache NULL pointer deref on mount / can't boot

2018-12-25 Thread Robert Collins
Public bug reported: After creating a bcache cache device with an 8k block size (see #1662407), a kernel oops happens every time device is probed. I'm not sure that there is any userspace bug present in #1662407 at all - it may just be kernel. I've attached a dmesg there, but can't actually get i

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1233075] Re: resizefs failure with raring

2014-03-25 Thread Robert Collins
I've reproduced this recently with saucy, without the --max-resize option, but only resizing to 20-30G from a 2G base, which is well within the heuristics ext4 has. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kerne

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1233075] Re: resizefs failure with raring

2014-03-25 Thread Robert Collins
Steven's report is with saucy as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1233075 Title: resizefs failure with raring Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1233075] Re: resizefs failure with raring

2013-10-01 Thread Robert Collins
We may have found some more data on the situation: bug 1233024 reports on a failure to resize with the same images.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1233075 Title: resizef

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1233075] Re: resizefs failure with raring

2013-10-01 Thread Robert Collins
Nuts, wrong reference... We may have found some more data on the situation: bug 1233008 reports on a failure to resize with the same images.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1233075] Re: resizefs failure with raring

2013-09-30 Thread Robert Collins
huh, root@undercloud-notcompute-jws3awlsb2kh:/home/heat-admin# lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:00 1.8T 0 disk ��sda1 8:1020G 0 part /

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1233075] Re: resizefs failure with raring

2013-09-30 Thread Robert Collins
interestingly quantal didn't resize, but it didn't lockup either. Definitely more investigation warranted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1233075 Title: resizefs failure

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1233075] [NEW] resizefs failure with raring

2013-09-30 Thread Robert Collins
Public bug reported: Deploying a raring cloud image with a 2.7G filesystem to 2TB hard disk crashes in resizefs [ 143.673885] 0800 880bd4b87f60 880bca8b7d00 8125b e47 [ 143.673945] Call Tra

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1180021] Re: I/O errors seen on tmpfs

2013-09-08 Thread Robert Collins
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-04/msg02662.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180021 Title: I/O errors seen on tmpfs Status in “linux” package in Ub