(Actually, I'm frustrated enough I'm just going to say it explicitly,
rather than indirectly: it looks like you didn't read my comment, as
even the thrust of your response--that "it's not just about installing
different versions of linux-tools"--isn't something I even hinted at as
the reason; the m
I not only understood that but explicitly stated as such; not just the
reasoning, but also the policy... however, that only applies to dynamic
linking: other packages--as I also explicitly demonstrated--link against
libbfd statically for this very reason; are you saying that there has
been a misund
I am leaving a comment to the effect that my issue is not something for
which logs are relevant.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https:/
Public bug reported:
The perf tool has an optional dependency on libbfd. Per Debian policy,
and due to some situation involving parallel installations of this
library, no packages should link dynamically against libbfd. In the
past, bugs have been filed to link perf statically against libbfd in bu
4 matches
Mail list logo
