Ok, this one has me a bit stumped...
We have a functioning production kerberos environment
that I'm trying to add a Solaris 11 (beta 79) client to.
The kdc in my immediate realm where the host principals
are located is a Solaris 9 host, and we have several working
Solaris 10 client machines with
Brian Thompson wrote:
>
> Ok, this one has me a bit stumped...
>
> We have a functioning production kerberos environment
> that I'm trying to add a Solaris 11 (beta 79) client to.
>
> The kdc in my immediate realm where the host principals
> are located is a Solari
Ken Raeburn wrote:
>On May 22, 2008, at 07:18, Anshuman Hazarika wrote:
>
>
>>I now know that we can make kerberos use openldap as its data store
>>backend, but only with heimdal as our kdc, not mit kerberos.
>>
>>
>
>Why do you think MIT Kerberos can't do that?
>
>Our current release ha
Hi all, I'm having a problem logging into a
non-windows kerberos realm from a w2k
workstation. The same realm username/password
works fine on the AD server due to a trust
and the w2k workstation can log in using
either a local account or an AD domain account.
The non-windows realm is on the domain
"Tony Hoyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 13:36:39 +, Brian Thompson wrote:
>
> > username. If I delete the local account it
> > doesn't work. There is an account in the AD
> > se
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam Hartman) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > "Tony" == Tony Hoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Tony> In any case it would be the KDC that would have to pass the
> Tony> AD authentication information - maybe he was referring to
> Tony> the pat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > Impirical evidence suggests you're giving an incomplete answer here.
> > > I have a W2K box on my desk for which I log into an MIT account which
> > > is mapped by the domain to a domain account. No local account exists.
> >
>
yer.
> I reside in Washington, USA, where Title 19 declares that sending me
> Unsolicited Commercial Email can result in a $500 fine.
> Harvesting of this address for purposes of bulk email (spam and UCE) is
> expressly prohibited unless by my explicit prior request. I retaliate
>
